16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-4018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of Jet Noise Azimuthal Components and Their Role in Source Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this we have a phenomenological interpretation linking the actuation to the far field. We note that the results of a number of other jet-noise control studies are consistent with this: noise abatement is most efficient when flows are driven with high ω-m combinations (Samimy et al 2007;Kopiev et al 2010). While we cannot affirm that the mean fields are in those cases stable to such actuation, this does seem likely, as the canonical mean field of a round subsonic jet is most stable to high frequencies and high azimuthal wavenumbers.…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this we have a phenomenological interpretation linking the actuation to the far field. We note that the results of a number of other jet-noise control studies are consistent with this: noise abatement is most efficient when flows are driven with high ω-m combinations (Samimy et al 2007;Kopiev et al 2010). While we cannot affirm that the mean fields are in those cases stable to such actuation, this does seem likely, as the canonical mean field of a round subsonic jet is most stable to high frequencies and high azimuthal wavenumbers.…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…4.1. The quieter flow: stabilisation of axisymmetric wavepackets We first consider the quieter St p = 0.46 case, and note that the greatest noise reduction is observed at low emission angles, where the sound field is known to be predominantly axisymmetric (Juvé, Sunyach & Comte-Bellot 1979;Kopiev et al 2010;Cavalieri et al 2012a) and dominated by a source mechanism driven by the axisymmetric component of the axial velocity fluctuation (Michalke & Fuchs 1975;Cavalieri et al 2013). This sound source is considered by many to comprise an axially extended non-compact wavepacket, understood as an instability of the mean field.…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, no anonymous opinion exists on how different mechanisms characterizing the dynamics of turbulent pulsations contribute to noise generation. For example, different authors consider different factors as sources of jet noise: small scale tur bulence [1][2][3][4][5][6], instability waves [6,7], and oscillations of large scale turbulent eddies [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, they are inconsistent with experimental noise data obtained by the azimuthal decomposition method [9], according to which subsonic jet noise is characterized by a qua drupole structure. Subsequent correlation models were also developed for quadrupole sources [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent study by Kopiev et al (2010) the azimuthal correlation of the far field noise was investigated for unexcited and tone-excited jets. However, both studies only considered a single jet Mach number and therefore did not investigate the Mach number scaling of the azimuthal modes.…”
Section: Mach Number Scaling Of Azimuthal Modes Of Subsonic Co-flowinmentioning
confidence: 99%