2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations in the (Sub)millimeter Background From Act × Blast

Abstract: We present measurements of the auto-and cross-frequency correlation power spectra of the cosmic (sub)millimeter background at 250, 350, and 500 μm (1200, 860, and 600 GHz) from observations made with the Balloonborne Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (BLAST); and at 1380 and 2030 μm (218 and 148 GHz) from observations made with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT). The overlapping observations cover 8.6 deg 2 in an area relatively free of Galactic dust near the south ecliptic pole. The ACT bands are sens… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 29 shows the power spectrum of cosmic infrared background anisotropies as computed on a simulated sky, and as measured by Planck (Planck Collaboration 2011k), and ACT . The agreement between the model and the measured power spectra is reasonable, but not perfect, and discrepancies will be addressed with improved modelling in future releases, in the light of recent advances on number counts and on correlations from observations with the BLAST balloon-borne experiment (Patanchon et al 2009;Viero et al 2009), SPT (Hall et al 2010), Herschel Cooray et al 2010), and from a combined analysis of ACT and BLAST (Hajian et al 2012). Also, the correlation between the CIB maps across the frequency range is almost unity in the current model, a feature that will have to be improved in the future using a more detailed model constrained by upcoming additional Planck observations.…”
Section: Cosmic Infrared Background Anisotropiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 29 shows the power spectrum of cosmic infrared background anisotropies as computed on a simulated sky, and as measured by Planck (Planck Collaboration 2011k), and ACT . The agreement between the model and the measured power spectra is reasonable, but not perfect, and discrepancies will be addressed with improved modelling in future releases, in the light of recent advances on number counts and on correlations from observations with the BLAST balloon-borne experiment (Patanchon et al 2009;Viero et al 2009), SPT (Hall et al 2010), Herschel Cooray et al 2010), and from a combined analysis of ACT and BLAST (Hajian et al 2012). Also, the correlation between the CIB maps across the frequency range is almost unity in the current model, a feature that will have to be improved in the future using a more detailed model constrained by upcoming additional Planck observations.…”
Section: Cosmic Infrared Background Anisotropiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Further theoretical investigation (Scott & White 1999;Haiman & Knox 2000) was stimulated by the detection of the infrared background in the COBE data (Puget et al 1996;Fixsen et al 1998), and the detection of bright "sub-millimetre" galaxies in SCUBA data (Hughes et al 1998). Subsequently, the clustering has been detected at 160 microns , at 250, 350 and 500 microns by the Balloon-borne Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (BLAST, Viero et al 2009;Hajian et al 2012) and at 217 GHz by SPT and ACT (Hall et al 2010;Dunkley et al 2011). Recent Planck measurements of the CIB (Planck Collaboration XVIII 2011) have extended the measurements at 217 GHz, 353 GHz, and 545 GHz to larger scales, and recent Herschel measurements (Viero et al 2013) have improved on the BLAST measurements and extended them to smaller angular scales.…”
Section: Clustered Power From Unresolved Point Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the theoretical systematic uncertainty in modeling the tSZ skewness is correspondingly lower as well. In addition, at 148 GHz, dusty star-forming galaxies are less prevalent in massive, low-redshift clusters (which contribute more to the skewness) than in high-redshift groups and clusters (which contribute more to the tSZ power spectrum) [20]. Thus, we expect the correlation between tSZ signal and dusty galaxy emission, which can complicate analyses of the tSZ effect, to be smaller for a measurement of the skewness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%