2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.023640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations in the low-density Fermi gas: Fermi-liquid state, dimerization, and Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer pairing

Abstract: We present ground state calculations for low-density Fermi gases described by two model interactions, an attractive square-well potential and a Lennard-Jones potential, of varying strength. We use the optimized Fermi-Hypernetted Chain integral equation method which has been proved to provide, in the density regimes of interest here, an accuracy better than one percent. We first examine the low-density expansion of the energy and compare with the exact answer by Huang and Yang (H. Huang and C. N. Yang, Phys. R… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(126 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,16. A recent in-depth study of correlations in the low-density Fermi gas 18 , with emphasis on the presence of Cooper pairing and dimerization, documents the power of the Euler-Lagrange FHNC approach adopted in the present work, especially when coupled with CBF perturbation theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…8,16. A recent in-depth study of correlations in the low-density Fermi gas 18 , with emphasis on the presence of Cooper pairing and dimerization, documents the power of the Euler-Lagrange FHNC approach adopted in the present work, especially when coupled with CBF perturbation theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As already pointed out, the maximum gap value obtained by Pavlou et al with AV 18 for their two optimized correlation functions differ by nearly a factor two for the Benhar choice) -reflecting the extreme sensitivity of the gap to inputs for the effective interaction. Recognizing that the induced interaction and energynumerator terms are absent in these two calculations, the information provided by Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Gap Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations