2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between serial pro-gastrin-releasing peptide and neuron-specific enolase levels, and the radiological response to treatment and survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic role for tumour markers in SCLC has not been fully established to date; however, some studies have investigated the relationship between prognosis and tumour markers. [34][35][36] Shibayama et al 36 reported on the complementary role of NSE and ProGRP; NSE was found to be superior to ProGRP as a prognostic factor, while ProGRP was more sensitive than NSE regarding the diagnosis of SCLC. Similar to the previous study, the pre-treatment serum NSE level showed a much better correlation with prognosis than ProGRP in our population; however, it was not found to be an independent prognostic factor, when adjusted for stage and PET volumetric parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic role for tumour markers in SCLC has not been fully established to date; however, some studies have investigated the relationship between prognosis and tumour markers. [34][35][36] Shibayama et al 36 reported on the complementary role of NSE and ProGRP; NSE was found to be superior to ProGRP as a prognostic factor, while ProGRP was more sensitive than NSE regarding the diagnosis of SCLC. Similar to the previous study, the pre-treatment serum NSE level showed a much better correlation with prognosis than ProGRP in our population; however, it was not found to be an independent prognostic factor, when adjusted for stage and PET volumetric parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical utility of ProGRP as a biomarker to distinguish SCLC from other lung cancers has been established in a number of studies [12,16,20,21,[39][40][41][42]. In a meta-analysis of 5146 patients enrolled in 11 clinical trials, the sensitivity and specificity of ProGRP in diagnosing SCLC was 0.716 (95% CI 0.688-0.743) and 0.921 (95% CI 0.909-0.932), respectively [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two studies[184,187] involving meta-analyses on 5146/6758 patients, 71% and 72% of patients with SCLC had elevated serum-proGRP levels; the specificity was 86% and 92% for SCLC, whereas in one study[184], 92% with other diseases/malignances had low levels. In a number of studies serum-proGRP determinations had greater sensitivity and specificity in SCLC patients than other proposed tumor markers(NSE,CYFRA-21-1)[188]. Changes in serum-proGRP levels show a better correlation with changes in tumor size with treatment in patients with SCLC than changes in serum-NSE and have greater prognostic value than changes in NSE[188].…”
Section: Bn-peptides-bnr: Lung-cancermentioning
confidence: 99%