The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl088985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations Between Dispersive Alfvén Wave Activity, Electron Energization, and Ion Outflow in the Inner Magnetosphere

Abstract: Using measurements from the Van Allen Probes, we show that field‐aligned fluxes of electrons energized by dispersive Alfvén waves (DAWs) are prominent in the inner magnetosphere during active conditions. These electrons have preferentially field‐aligned anisotropies from 1.2 to >2 at energies ranging from tens of electron volts to several kiloelectron volts (keV), with largest values being coincident with magnetic field dipolarizations. Comparisons reveal that DAW energy densities and Poynting fluxes are stron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical observations suggest that magnetotail electrons (first of all, cold electron populations) are indeed anisotropic (Artemyev et al, 2020;Walsh et al, 2011), whereas ions are generally isotropic (C.-P. Wang et al, 2013), but may be nongyrotropic (see discussion in Artemyev et al, 2019). Most probable origins of electron anisotropy are field-aligned cold ionospheric outflow (Walsh et al, 2013) and field-aligned electron acceleration by kinetic Alfven waves in the magnetotail (Artemyev, Rankin, & Blanco, 2015;Damiano et al, 2015;Hull et al, 2020). Ion nongyrotropy likely results from combined contributions of cold, field-aligned anisotropic beams and hot, transversely anisotropic unmagnetized ions (see discussion in R. Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical observations suggest that magnetotail electrons (first of all, cold electron populations) are indeed anisotropic (Artemyev et al, 2020;Walsh et al, 2011), whereas ions are generally isotropic (C.-P. Wang et al, 2013), but may be nongyrotropic (see discussion in Artemyev et al, 2019). Most probable origins of electron anisotropy are field-aligned cold ionospheric outflow (Walsh et al, 2013) and field-aligned electron acceleration by kinetic Alfven waves in the magnetotail (Artemyev, Rankin, & Blanco, 2015;Damiano et al, 2015;Hull et al, 2020). Ion nongyrotropy likely results from combined contributions of cold, field-aligned anisotropic beams and hot, transversely anisotropic unmagnetized ions (see discussion in R. Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) upward electron beams accelerated by an electric field parallel to the magnetic field and near downward field-aligned currents [Carlson et al, 1998;Hull et al 2020]. Such low-energy ionospheric electron beams have been observed in both the magnetotail [Walsh et al, 2013;Artemyev et al, 2015] and the outer radiation belt [Kellogg et al, 2011;Mourenas et al, 2015].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We postulate that the latitudinal width of the source area is 1°, resulting in the poleward boundary of GMLAT = 64.6° (L = 5.44). The altitude of 4,000 km and the initial pitch angle of α = 100° are based on the idea that ionospheric O + ions are uplifted by soft electron precipitation and/or Poynting flux enhancement at substorm onset and then they are further accelerated by electromagnetic disturbances in the perpendicular direction to flow out from the upper ionosphere (e.g., Chaston et al, 2004Chaston et al, , 2005Hull et al, 2020;Shen & Knudsen, 2020;Strangeway et al, 2000Strangeway et al, , 2005. The test O + ions are set to have an initial energy E k between 10 eV and 1 keV, where E k is the kth step of the 21 logarithmically equally spaced energy steps (i.e., E 1 = 10 1 eV, E 21 = 10 3 eV, and ΔE = E k+1 /E k = 10 0.1 ).…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%