1993
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1993.77.2.650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations among Three Measures of Personality Type

Abstract: Correlational comparisons were made between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and both the Keirsey Temperament Sorter and its computer version, Please Understand Me, for 103 undergraduate students in psychology. Values from .68 to .86 suggest that these three instruments were measuring the same constructs. Specific differences are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter provided a relatively short and accessible measure of psychological type appropriate for inclusion within a larger questionnaire. Recent empirical studies support the reliability and validity of the KTS as an effective and efficient operationalisation of the Jungian constructs of psychological type (Waskel & Coleman, 1991;Quinn, Lewis & Fischer 1992;Tucker & Gillespie 1993;Fearn, Francis & Wilcox 2001;Kelly & Jugovic 2001;Francis, Craig & Robbins unpublished). The main aim was to relate preference for interpretations to preference in the perceiving and judging processes, rather than to psychological type as such.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The latter provided a relatively short and accessible measure of psychological type appropriate for inclusion within a larger questionnaire. Recent empirical studies support the reliability and validity of the KTS as an effective and efficient operationalisation of the Jungian constructs of psychological type (Waskel & Coleman, 1991;Quinn, Lewis & Fischer 1992;Tucker & Gillespie 1993;Fearn, Francis & Wilcox 2001;Kelly & Jugovic 2001;Francis, Craig & Robbins unpublished). The main aim was to relate preference for interpretations to preference in the perceiving and judging processes, rather than to psychological type as such.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, in some cases, the MBTI has provided information above and beyond what the measures of the Five-Factor model of personality could provide [e.g., 65]. In our study, we chose to use the MBTI to assess personality types because it is widely used [69], it focuses on how individuals process information, and it is more generally accepted in business decision making contexts than any other personality test of which we are aware. The MBTI has been used by many decision theory researchers to study decision patterns among personality types [70][71][72][73][74] and test-retest studies have shown strong reliability [75].…”
Section: Personality Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected options are then employed to assign respondents to one or other of the four binary types. Although there is not perfect symmetry Understanding cathedral visitors 10 between different operationalisations of psychological type theory there is a growing body of evidence to support the concurrent validity of these instruments (Quinn, Lewis, & Fischer, 1992;Tucker & Gillespie, 1993;Kelly & Jugovic, 2001;Francis, Robbins, & Craig, 2007).…”
Section: Psychological Type Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%