2015
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlational Studies in Typological and Historical Linguistics

Abstract: We review a number of recent studies that have identified either correlations between different linguistic features (e.g., implicational universals) or correlations between linguistic features and nonlinguistic properties of speakers or their environment (e.g., effects of geography on vocabulary). We compare large-scale quantitative studies with more traditional theoretical and historical linguistic research and identify divergent assumptions and methods that have led linguists to be skeptical of correlational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, similarities and differences across languages cannot be compared as if they were statistically independent data points, because closely related languages are expected to be similar in many aspects. This hierarchical pattern of similarities can confound attempts to find causal correlations between aspects of human language and culture by creating spurious correlations, a methodological challenge sometimes referred to as Galton's problem (23,24). The comparison of rates of evolutionary change in different lineages presents additional challenges because we need to be able to infer the number of evolutionary changes that have occurred along each lineage (25,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, similarities and differences across languages cannot be compared as if they were statistically independent data points, because closely related languages are expected to be similar in many aspects. This hierarchical pattern of similarities can confound attempts to find causal correlations between aspects of human language and culture by creating spurious correlations, a methodological challenge sometimes referred to as Galton's problem (23,24). The comparison of rates of evolutionary change in different lineages presents additional challenges because we need to be able to infer the number of evolutionary changes that have occurred along each lineage (25,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cognitive science continues to evolve, artificial intelligent approaches such as statistical learning and network science are becoming increasingly attractive and relevant to researchers in cognitive science and artificial intelligence. Recent work [1][2][3][4][5][6] demonstrates that statistical learning is one of the most deeply explored phenomena in the field of cognitive science. Noticeably, the increasing utilization of network science with statistical learning [7][8][9] makes network-based approaches a robust tool in cognitive science and computational linguistics [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, languages are not independent data points. This problem has long been recognised in cultural and linguistic studies as 'Galton's problem' (Tylor 1889;Mace & Pagel 1994;Bentz & Winter 2013;Roberts & Winters 2013;Ladd et al 2015), but linguists have few methods to effectively overcome this issue. One method to circumvent statistical non-independence in comparative biology is to use sisterpair comparisons, which examines the differences between pairs of closest relatives (sisters) and compares this to other more distantly related lineages (outgroup).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%