2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation study between facet joint cartilage and intervertebral discs in early lumbar vertebral degeneration using T2, T2* and T1ρ mapping

Abstract: Recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging have allowed for the early detection of biochemical changes in intervertebral discs and articular cartilage. Here, we assessed the feasibility of axial T2, T2* and T1ρ mapping of the lumbar facet joints (LFJs) to determine correlations between cartilage and intervertebral discs (IVDs) in early lumbar vertebral degeneration. We recruited 22 volunteers and examined 202 LFJs and 101 IVDs with morphological (sagittal and axial FSE T2-weighted imaging) and axial bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to our observation, they observed relatively high T2* values in the anterior AF (T2* = 70.7 ± 75.4 ms) and posterior AF (T2* = 30.7 ± 11.3 ms) in IVDs with Pfirrmann grade I while their T2* values in the NP (T2* = 63.8 ± 26.8 ms) were similar to ours. Zhang et al studied the correlation of facet joint cartilage degeneration and IVD degeneration in a study cohort of 22 healthy, adult volunteers with nonspecific acute LBP (mean age: 33.2 years ranging from 21 to 44 years) using T2‐, T2*‐, and T1ρ‐mapping in the axial plane. The mean T2* values in normal appearing discs (Pfirrmann grade I) were 79.16 ± 10.22 ms in the NP, 30.97 ± 7.51 ms in the anterior AF and 34.15 ± 5.82 ms in the posterior AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to our observation, they observed relatively high T2* values in the anterior AF (T2* = 70.7 ± 75.4 ms) and posterior AF (T2* = 30.7 ± 11.3 ms) in IVDs with Pfirrmann grade I while their T2* values in the NP (T2* = 63.8 ± 26.8 ms) were similar to ours. Zhang et al studied the correlation of facet joint cartilage degeneration and IVD degeneration in a study cohort of 22 healthy, adult volunteers with nonspecific acute LBP (mean age: 33.2 years ranging from 21 to 44 years) using T2‐, T2*‐, and T1ρ‐mapping in the axial plane. The mean T2* values in normal appearing discs (Pfirrmann grade I) were 79.16 ± 10.22 ms in the NP, 30.97 ± 7.51 ms in the anterior AF and 34.15 ± 5.82 ms in the posterior AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have attempted to investigate the qualitative and quantitative properties of the IVD via biochemically sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that includes GagCEST (glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer), dGEMRIC (delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI), T1rho, sodium and T2 mapping . The present study uses the T2* mapping technique, a method that is comparable to T2 mapping MRI, which has been proven feasible on human and animal samples, in vitro and in vivo in the lumbar and cervical spine . T2* mapping is implementable on all routine 1.5 and 3 T MRI systems, requires a relatively short acquisition time and allows for high image‐resolution and three‐dimensional (3D) imaging …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have demonstrated that quantitative T 1ρ mapping is a promising technique for detecting biochemical changes in IVDs during the process of degeneration (14)(15)(16)(17)(18). To date, research on T 1ρ measurements of IVDs has focused on changes in the NP (16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), and the AF (20)(21)(22). The CEP may be degraded, affecting nutrient availability and cell metabolism in the remainder of the IVD and, thus, contribute to degeneration of the NP and AF (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…modified Pfirrmann grade may reflect loss of proteoglycans during the process of degeneration(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%