1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(97)80048-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of wrist ligamentotaxis with carpal distraction: Implications for external fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, it is possible to compare relative bone motions to a maximum of 3.3mm of distraction, which was the average for our subjects. At 3.3mm of distraction, Loebig et al6 found that lunocapitate distraction was 2.4 times as much as radiolunate distraction, which is consistent with our findings. Similarly, they measured 2.2 times more distraction at the radioscaphoid joint than the radiolunate joint, which is consistent with our findings6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That said, it is possible to compare relative bone motions to a maximum of 3.3mm of distraction, which was the average for our subjects. At 3.3mm of distraction, Loebig et al6 found that lunocapitate distraction was 2.4 times as much as radiolunate distraction, which is consistent with our findings. Similarly, they measured 2.2 times more distraction at the radioscaphoid joint than the radiolunate joint, which is consistent with our findings6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Bartosh and Saldana37 found an average of 3mm of overall wrist distraction in 19 cadaver wrists, regardless of the amount of load used. Loebig et al6 performed distractions on twelve cadaveric wrists using a standard servohydraulic mechanical testing device. They measured almost 2.5 times as much distraction at 80N of load than we did at 98 N(almost 8 mm vs. 3.3±3.1 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). Our data support the findings of Loebig et al 4 Although the external fixator was locked with the wrist placed in the neutral position at 0 mm of distraction, an associated ulnar deviation was noticed during the radial-side wrist distraction caused by the application of the load on the second metacarpal distally. Our protocol was not designed to investigate the ulnar deviation; however, it seems that the progressive ulnar deviation of the wrist causes ulnar-side tendon relaxation between 0 and 4 mm of distraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this wrist, a 7 mm distraction gap was utilised, based on evidence from the literature derived from external fixation distraction of the distal radial fracture which suggested that distraction of 3 mm fully tensions radiocarpal ligamentous structures [19]; that distraction of 5–8 mm is not associated with residual radiocarpal, intercarpal, or metacarpal stiffness [20]; and that greater than 8 mm distraction increases force to greater than 80 N through the carpus and thus may be excessive [21]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%