2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Tissue Doppler and Two-Dimensional Speckle Myocardial Velocities and Comparison of Derived Ratios with Invasively Measured Left Ventricular Filling Pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diastolic function was assessed by measuring the rate of volume changes over the mitral valve, basal myocardial velocities during diastole (V L early diastole and V L atrial contraction), and a speckle tracking derived E/e' ratio as an estimate of LV filling pressure. 15,16 The interaction between the LV and the arterial system was explored by assessing blood pressure and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), a simplified estimate of cardiovascular efficiency. 17,18 VAC is defined as the ratio of the arterial elastance (Ea, derived from end systolic pressure divided by stroke volume) to ventricular elastance (Ees, derived from end systolic pressure divided by end systolic volume).…”
Section: Echocardiographic Image Acquisition and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diastolic function was assessed by measuring the rate of volume changes over the mitral valve, basal myocardial velocities during diastole (V L early diastole and V L atrial contraction), and a speckle tracking derived E/e' ratio as an estimate of LV filling pressure. 15,16 The interaction between the LV and the arterial system was explored by assessing blood pressure and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), a simplified estimate of cardiovascular efficiency. 17,18 VAC is defined as the ratio of the arterial elastance (Ea, derived from end systolic pressure divided by stroke volume) to ventricular elastance (Ees, derived from end systolic pressure divided by end systolic volume).…”
Section: Echocardiographic Image Acquisition and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have shown that E/Ea is a reliable estimate of LV filling pressure, but most of these studies included large proportions of patients with depressed LVEF (<50%) and further demonstrated that E/Ea was more accurate for LV filling pressure estimation in patients with depressed, rather than preserved LVEF 8–16,21 . One recent study showed that E/Ea > 8 was a reasonably accurate predictor of LVEDP > 12 mmHg in 43 patients with preserved LVEF 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsed Doppler was used to record transmitral inflow in the apical four‐chamber view 20 . Tissue Doppler velocities were then acquired at the septal and lateral annular sites and averaged as previously described 11,12,21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LVEDP 50:441 1:363 lateralE=Ea ð Þ ½ It has been shown that the correlation coefficient between LVEDP and lateral E/Ea is higher and its limits of agreement are smaller than those of other mitral segments. 7,8,13,17 Therefore, we used only lateral E/Ea ratio for the estimation of LVEDP and quantification of myocardial wall stress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%