2011
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12117806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of the Rates of Solvolysis of i-Butyl Fluoroformate and a Consideration of Leaving-Group Effects

Abstract: The specific rates of solvolysis of isobutyl fluoroformate (1) have been measured at 40.0 °C in 22 pure and binary solvents. These results correlated well with the extended Grunwald-Winstein (G-W) equation, which incorporated the NT solvent nucleophilicity scale and the YCl solvent ionizing power scale. The sensitivities (l and m-values) to changes in solvent nucleophilicity and solvent ionizing power, and the kF/kCl values are very similar to those observed previously for solvolyses of n-octyl fluoroformate, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pathway leads to a relatively low l value and a relatively high m value, such that the l/ m ratio is typically appreciably below unity ( l/m = 0.45). The l and m values of 2 in Table 4 are very similar to those for the earlier studied halogenoformate esters, which have been shown to solvolyze with the additional step of an addition–elimination pathway being rate determining (Equation (4)) and an ionization pathway (Equation (5)) [24,25,26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This pathway leads to a relatively low l value and a relatively high m value, such that the l/ m ratio is typically appreciably below unity ( l/m = 0.45). The l and m values of 2 in Table 4 are very similar to those for the earlier studied halogenoformate esters, which have been shown to solvolyze with the additional step of an addition–elimination pathway being rate determining (Equation (4)) and an ionization pathway (Equation (5)) [24,25,26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For example, HFIP and TFE have been compared with nonfluorinated alcohols such as MeOH and EtOH for their ability to influence the mechanism of solvolysis of various chloroformates and their analogue A change in the course of solvolytic mechanism was observed for certain chloroformate substrates when the fluorinated alcohols were used either as pure solvents or as aqueous binary mixtures (Scheme ). Previous studies had shown that solvolyses of phenyl chloroformate universally proceed via addition–elimination mechanisms. , Similar to phenyl chloroformate, the solvolyses of propargyl chloroformate and isobutyl fluoroformate proceeded via bimolecular addition–elimination processes across all solvents tested (MeOH, EtOH, acetone, TFE, and HFIP) and various binary mixtures. In contrast, alkenyl chloroformates such as isopropenyl chloroformate predominantly proceeded via bimolecular addition–elimination mechanisms in all solvents except for aqueous HFIP mixtures (97–70% HFIP) and 97% TFE, for which superimposed unimolecular (S N 1) type ionization pathways were suggested .…”
Section: Solvolysis Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This ratio is consistent with the addition step of carbonyl-addition process being rate determining. Multiple studies contrasting other alkyl haloformate esters [46–50] show that the fluoroformates that have a stronger carbon-fluorine bond solvolyze faster than their corresponding chloroformate esters and such a high F:Cl ratio also endures in benzoyl halides [33,51,52]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%