2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of technical surgical goals to the GDI and investigation of post-operative GDI change in children with cerebral palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GMFCS I–III, or I and II, or II and III); (3) and were published as full text in a peer‐reviewed journal in English. Articles relating to responsiveness were limited to those that measured the responsiveness to active exercise interventions since responsiveness to surgical, medical, and passive interventions has been reported elsewhere 20‐23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GMFCS I–III, or I and II, or II and III); (3) and were published as full text in a peer‐reviewed journal in English. Articles relating to responsiveness were limited to those that measured the responsiveness to active exercise interventions since responsiveness to surgical, medical, and passive interventions has been reported elsewhere 20‐23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles relating to responsiveness were limited to those that measured the responsiveness to active exercise interventions since responsiveness to surgical, medical, and passive interventions has been reported elsewhere. [20][21][22][23] Articles were excluded if they: (1) did not include ambulant children (i.e. they only included children in GMFCS levels III, IV, and/or V); (2) did not separate analysis of ambulant from non-ambulant children; (3) did not include physical assessments (i.e.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GDI and GVI indexes were developed to present how far an individual’s gait differs from a normal gait pattern [ 7 , 9 ]. The GDI has been used to assess the gait of children with CP [ 5 , 10 , 16 , 19 , 20 ]. However, we did not find any scientific researches concerning using GVI in this group of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, they observed that using both GDI and TAGs system can improve postoperative assessment in patients with CP at different level of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) (I–III). They did not observe any significant differences concerning changes of the GDI results after surgical treatment between different levels (I–III) of GMFCS [ 19 ]. Reis et al showed, that wearing of AFO significantly improves step length, gait speed, and GDI in children with diplegic CP, but only changes in step length was clinically important [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GDI and the GPS were developed for gait assessment of patients in general and not exclusively for CP patients [19,21,23,31,32]. Furthermore, the GGI and the GDI were suggested as an adequate parameter for follow-up evaluation of gait and correction procedures [33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%