SAE Technical Paper Series 2014
DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-0128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Subjective and Objective Measures of On-Center Handling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm, objective parameters were introduced. In the weave test, the objective parameters, such as on-center stiffness, steering friction, and angle hysteresis, were as proposed by Jang et al 14 Here, the on-center stiffness is the gradient at zero angle, the steering friction is abscissa deadband, and the angle hysteresis is ordinate deadband. In the transition test, off-center stiffness and average steering friction are key factors.…”
Section: Hardware-in-the-loop Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm, objective parameters were introduced. In the weave test, the objective parameters, such as on-center stiffness, steering friction, and angle hysteresis, were as proposed by Jang et al 14 Here, the on-center stiffness is the gradient at zero angle, the steering friction is abscissa deadband, and the angle hysteresis is ordinate deadband. In the transition test, off-center stiffness and average steering friction are key factors.…”
Section: Hardware-in-the-loop Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r door = 0:781m, H door = 1:261m, A extractors = 0:004m 2 , A leakage = 0:0063m 2 , u = 45 8 The initial swept air volume, air mass, and the total air exit area are defined as: 36 Automotive sound 40 listeners used Hara et al 37 Door closing sound company employees Lee et al 27 Automotive sound quality 33 luxury automotive club member Chen and Wang 38 Automotive interior sound quality 30 (students/professors/ drivers) Lee 39 Automotive odor evaluation 20-30 interested people Flannagan et al 40 Led headlamps 25 active drivers Tsutsumi et al 41 Cabin comfort and fatigue 15 college aged members Dang et al 32 On-center steering force 15 research staffs Zhai and Conggan 42 Sound quality 24 evaluators Baker et al 43 Sound quality 12 untrained jurors (customers) Isa et al (2014) 44 Vehicle Drivability 4 Expert drivers Hamdi et al ( 2007) 45 Brake rattle noise 3 Expert evaluators Rajesh et al 46 Brake performance 5 Expert drivers Jang et al 47 On-center handling 1 Professional test driver Chandrasekaran et al 48 Drivability 5 Expert drivers Crolla et al 49 Vehicle handling 8 Expert drivers Eduardo 50 Vehicle steering 3 Expert drivers Nybacka et al 33 Vehicle Steering 7-10 Expert drivers Liu et al 51 Vehicle Considering the above calculated initial values and using time interval of Dt = 0:0001 s, the equations ( 6) and ( 7) are solved iteratively until door opening angle is 0 8 and swept air volume V air = 0. The total air binding energy is calculated as E air binde = 8, 61Joule.…”
Section: Air Binding Effect Based On the Below Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…一般的な感性性能は, 顧客の要求特性を調査し, それに合致した特性を造り出すことで行われている. しかし, 操舵感においては, 一般ドライバが操舵感を評価することが困難な場合が多い. 特性の異なる車両を数台用意し, 試乗を行って調査することも実際上難しい.また一般ドライバは経験不足で操舵感を評価できない場合が多く, たとえ良し悪しが評価できても,細かな特性の違いを評価し,言葉に置き換えることが出来ない.従ってテスト ドライバによる主観的な評価によって行われることが一般的である.しかし,主観評価の定量化だけでは物理的 な特性との対応が取れない.そこで,操舵角のサイン入力でのリサジュー波形から数値を読み取り,代用特性と して主観評価との相関を検討することも行われている (Jang et al, 2014), , (Farrer,1993), Fig.4 (a). As a result, driver's steering operations are changed as shown in Fig.4 (c).…”
Section: .操舵感の定量化の考え方unclassified