1985
DOI: 10.1306/ad461c73-16f7-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of North America--COSUNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recently published, large-to intermediate-scale geologic map or report on the general geology of the area of interest is usually a good place to start. Alternatively, for the U.S., the set of 20 Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) charts (AAPG 1983(AAPG -1986 provides 570 stratigraphic columns throughout the U.S., excluding Hawaii (Childs 1985). For Canada, a similar, but older, set of four correlation charts was published by the Geological Survey of Canada (Douglas 1967, part C).…”
Section: Information Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently published, large-to intermediate-scale geologic map or report on the general geology of the area of interest is usually a good place to start. Alternatively, for the U.S., the set of 20 Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) charts (AAPG 1983(AAPG -1986 provides 570 stratigraphic columns throughout the U.S., excluding Hawaii (Childs 1985). For Canada, a similar, but older, set of four correlation charts was published by the Geological Survey of Canada (Douglas 1967, part C).…”
Section: Information Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…collaboration, geology, macrostratigraphy, rock record, stratigraphy, visualization Despite this flexibility, the current iteration of Macrostrat is primarily a chronostratigraphic project, and most Macrostrat columns are regional-scale records organized in geologic time. Columns and their constituent units are sourced primarily from regionally defined, representative stratigraphic summaries compiled at basin and continental scales (e.g., COSUNA; Childs, 1985). However, more localized scales of data are increasingly being ingested as part of data-assimilation projects (Segessenman, 2020, Section 4.1.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%