1996
DOI: 10.1080/10106049609354546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of rangeland cover measures to satellite‐imagery‐derived vegetation indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous work, where combined field observations and remotely sensed imagery provided some predictive capabilities in semiarid ecosystems (Tueller and Yuan 1992, Tueller 1992, Basavaraju 1994, Keller-Hatzell 1992, Senseman 1996, the results of this study were not conclusive. The data sets studied were, in most cases, of high statistical significance and seemed to describe relationships of interest.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike previous work, where combined field observations and remotely sensed imagery provided some predictive capabilities in semiarid ecosystems (Tueller and Yuan 1992, Tueller 1992, Basavaraju 1994, Keller-Hatzell 1992, Senseman 1996, the results of this study were not conclusive. The data sets studied were, in most cases, of high statistical significance and seemed to describe relationships of interest.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Additional studies using more observations on north slopes and using all shrub dominated vegetation types might provide greater among-site variability and thus serve to improve the multiple linear regression models. It may also be that these particular ARTR/AGSP releves lacked the overall variation that were found in earlier studies (Tueller and Yuan 1992, Tueller 1992, Basavaraju 1994, Keller-Hatzel 1992, and Senseman 1996 and tended to reduce the R 2 values and thus reduce the predictability. Another factor is that hypotheses testing was conducted using either May or August radiance data from satellite images, while LCTA field measurements of vegetation were collected throughout the summer months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The statistical model relates point and image data to create the C Factor data layer. The statistical techniques used to relate point and image data could be found in Senseman et al (1996) and Wu and Westervelt (1994).…”
Section: Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially problematic when comparisons are being made across different soil types that may refl ect different amounts of light in the red and near infrared wavelengths (i.e., soils with different brightness values). The soil-adjusted vegetation index was developed as a modifi cation of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index to correct for the infl uence of soil brightness when vegetative cover is low (Richardson and Everitt, 1992;Lyon et al, 1998;Senseman et al, 1996).…”
Section: Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index(savi)mentioning
confidence: 99%