2009
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03360708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio to Laboratory International Normalized Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients Taking Warfarin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
21
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to laboratory analysis of a venous blood sample, the emergence of point‐of‐care (POC) INR testing of a whole blood sample from a finger prick has provided more convenient INR monitoring for both patients and providers. In general, the literature supports that these POC devices can reliably monitor INR and that they correlate well with laboratory analysis . INR results can be affected by abnormal hematocrit, clotted specimens, time to perform assay, anticoagulant contamination, and improper blood sample …”
Section: Prothrombin Time/international Normalized Ratiomentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to laboratory analysis of a venous blood sample, the emergence of point‐of‐care (POC) INR testing of a whole blood sample from a finger prick has provided more convenient INR monitoring for both patients and providers. In general, the literature supports that these POC devices can reliably monitor INR and that they correlate well with laboratory analysis . INR results can be affected by abnormal hematocrit, clotted specimens, time to perform assay, anticoagulant contamination, and improper blood sample …”
Section: Prothrombin Time/international Normalized Ratiomentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In general, the literature supports that these POC devices can reliably monitor INR and that they correlate well with laboratory analysis. [15][16][17] INR results can be affected by abnormal hematocrit, clotted speci- mens, time to perform assay, anticoagulant contamination, and improper blood sample. 8 The INR is not the ideal assay for patients with liver disease because the results can be misinterpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, test results measured with POC devices sometimes were affected by hematocrit values, heparin use, and antiphospholipid antibodies . Hoel et al found that POC INRs correlated well with plasma INR measures in hemodialysis patients, and that anemia did not influence this correlation. In the same study, it was found that the cost of INR determination using the POC device was less than with the traditional method ($2.06 vs. $2.12 per patient) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15Y17 Two of those studies focused on hemodialysis patients. 15, 16 Hoel and colleagues 15 found high levels of agreement on Bland-Altman analysis and strong correlations between fingerstick point-of-care blood samples and samples drawn from a dialysis access device (graft, fistula, or central catheter) in the 340 paired samples they collected. Rioux and colleagues 16 compared blood samples drawn from a heparinized central catheter and VP in 30 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%