Correlation Analysis in Chemistry 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8831-3_8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of nmr Chemical Shifts with Hammett σ Values and Analogous Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation of experimental observables with the various Hammett-type relations that have been developed over the years has helped to put these ideas on a more quantitative (though still largely empirical) basis. [4][5][6][7][8] In so doing, the physical-organic community in particular has been able to develop tremendous physical and mechanistic insights into the cause-and-effect relationship between charge polarization and chemical reactivity. [9][10][11][12][13] A comparable level of understanding of the effect of spin on chemical reactivity suffers in part from the lack of a similarly intuitive counterpart to electronegativity for spin polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation of experimental observables with the various Hammett-type relations that have been developed over the years has helped to put these ideas on a more quantitative (though still largely empirical) basis. [4][5][6][7][8] In so doing, the physical-organic community in particular has been able to develop tremendous physical and mechanistic insights into the cause-and-effect relationship between charge polarization and chemical reactivity. [9][10][11][12][13] A comparable level of understanding of the effect of spin on chemical reactivity suffers in part from the lack of a similarly intuitive counterpart to electronegativity for spin polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chart illustrates an insignificant effect of the properties of the phosphine ligand on the catalytic activity of the complexes. The order of increasing activities of the activated species, i.e., 8 (PPh 3 ) < 10 P(C 6 H 4 Me-4) 3 < 1a (PCy 3 ) < 9 P(C 6 H 4 CF 3 -4) 3 does not correlate with decreasing σ-donor ability of the phosphine ligands (represented by Hammet constant) [1213]. The highest activity was indeed observed for complex 9 containing the weakest σ-donor and potentially most easily dissociating ligand P(C 6 H 4 CF 3 -4) 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The smaller enantioselectivity of m-substituted compounds (as compared to p-substituted) could also be explained in terms of their smaller electron donating power (p-F − = 0.15, m-F − = 0.34; p-Me − = −0.14, m-Me − = −0.06; p-OMe − = −0.28, m-OMe − = 0.10 [21][22][23] ). It should, however, be noted that no straightforward relationship was found for the set of p-and msubstituted compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationship between enantioselectivities and Hammet constants[21][22][23] for p-substituted compounds 1, 6, 7, 8, and 11.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%