2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0514-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of MRI findings with clinical findings of trochanteric pain syndrome

Abstract: Patients with trochanteric pain syndrome always have peritrochanteric T2 abnormalities and are significantly more likely to have abductor tendinopathy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, although the absence of peritrochanteric T2 MR abnormalities makes trochanteric pain syndrome unlikely, detection of these abnormalities on MRI is a poor predictor of trochanteric pain syndrome as these findings are present in a high percentage of patients without trochanteric pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
134
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[3]) and (2) the comparison of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic methods that are both compared to the gold standard on the basis of the same experimental units, e.g. images or patients (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]) and (2) the comparison of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic methods that are both compared to the gold standard on the basis of the same experimental units, e.g. images or patients (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI typically shows peritrochanteric abnormalities, including bursal thickening and edema, and gluteal insertional tendinopathy or tearing. Blankenbaker et al 12 showed that findings on MRI do not correlate well with symptoms. In an evaluation of 256 hips, 88% of patients with trochanteric pain had MRI abnormalities at the gluteal insertion and 50% of asymptomatic patients had similar MRI findings, thereby underscoring the importance of clinical examination in these patients.…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, GT was defined clinically (Fearon et al, 2013;Segal et al, 2007;Woodley et al, 2008) with subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmation of tendon pathology (Blankenbaker et al, 2008). Initial inclusion criteria were the presence of unilateral lateral hip pain (Fearon et al, 2013;Segal et al, 2007;Woodley et al, 2008) ≥ 4/10 on the A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical screening was performed by a physiotherapist to confirm a primary clinical diagnosis of GT, defined as reproduction of trochanteric pain ≥ 4/10 with palpation of the greater trochanter (Fearon et al, 2013; and during ≥ 1/6 diagnostic clinical tests for GT (Fearon et al, 2013;Grimaldi et al, 2014;Lequesne et al, 2008b) (Supplementary material). MRI diagnosis of GT was defined by published classification criteria (Blankenbaker et al, 2008). Exclusion criteria were: (1) clinical or radiological diagnosis of intra-articular hip pathology, the former defined as reproduction of groin pain during passive hip quadrant Troelsen et al, 2009) and the latter by evidence of avascular necrosis, bony lesions or evidence of osteoarthritis (Kellegren and Lawrence Grade 2 or above) on plain X-ray and (2) BMI>36kg/m 2 (due to difficulties with skin marker placement for 3D gait analysis).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%