2000
DOI: 10.1086/317822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Microwave and Hard X‐Ray Spectral Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
65
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
14
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have mentioned that a similar flattening was reported earlier based on the microwave-to-X-ray slope comparisons (Silva et al 2000;White et al 2011). In the previous cases, however, the radio-derived and X-ray-derived spectral indices of nonthermal electrons were obtained using one or another approximation, e.g., from the thick-target fit of the footpoint X-ray emission or a simplified analytical Dulk-Marsh formula for the GS spectrum, which necessarily involves some level of Figure 2); (e): [30,50,70,90]% contours of the OVSA 5.6 GHz emission (white; same as in Figure 2) on top of the computed microwave 5.6 GHz image; (f): model HXR emission at 15 keV (blue) on top of the model microwave image at 5.6 GHz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have mentioned that a similar flattening was reported earlier based on the microwave-to-X-ray slope comparisons (Silva et al 2000;White et al 2011). In the previous cases, however, the radio-derived and X-ray-derived spectral indices of nonthermal electrons were obtained using one or another approximation, e.g., from the thick-target fit of the footpoint X-ray emission or a simplified analytical Dulk-Marsh formula for the GS spectrum, which necessarily involves some level of Figure 2); (e): [30,50,70,90]% contours of the OVSA 5.6 GHz emission (white; same as in Figure 2) on top of the computed microwave 5.6 GHz image; (f): model HXR emission at 15 keV (blue) on top of the model microwave image at 5.6 GHz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, we quickly find that it is not possible to obtain a good fit to the microwave spectrum with such a steep electron energy spectrum, irrespective of other model assumptions. Unavoidably, we have to assume the existence of a spectral break up above some energy, to a lower spectral index of about δ n2 ≈3.5 to fit the high-frequency microwave spectral slope, which may not be surprising given that a number of previous radio-to-X-ray comparisons (see, e.g., Silva et al 2000;White et al 2011, and references therein) concluded that the radio-derived spectra of the nonthermal electrons are often flatter than the X-rayderived ones.…”
Section: D Modeling: the Rise Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrons with higher energies are trapped for longer periods than the slow electrons and consequently are depleted from the loop-legs (e.g., Lee & Gary 2000). This result is not in disagreement with Silva et al (2000) measurements from X rays and microwave spectra. They found that, in general, the electronic spectrum is harder for the high energy range (as inferred from microwaves) than for the lower energy range (as inferred from hard X rays).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Statistical and case studies in the last two decades (Kosugi, Dennis, & Kai 1988 and references therein), and most recently by Silva, Wang, & Gary (2000), revealed other respects in which the impulsive and gradual emissions show contrasting properties. These include (1) the microwaves in the gradual events show greater time delays, by more than a few tens of seconds, with respect to the hard X-rays than in the impulsive events (Silva et al 2000); (2) the gradual events exhibit a harder and hardening (soft-hard-harder, or SHH) spectrum compared with the impulsive events, which exhibit a soft-hard-soft (SHS) spectrum (Silva et al 2000); and (3) the gradual bursts are usually microwave-rich events, and statistically the ratio of the microwave to hard X-ray flux is larger in the gradual events than in the impulsive events by a factor of 5 (Kosugi et al 1988;Silva et al 2000). The most critical issue is whether these contrasting properties between impulsive and gradual emissions are produced by different acceleration mechanisms or merely represent transport effects, such as precipitation versus trapping, due to different properties of the ambient plasmas and magnetic configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%