Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and cervical dysplasia. Accurate and sensitive genotyping of multiple oncogenic HPVs is essential for a multitude of both clinical and research uses. We developed a modified general primer (MGP) PCR system with five forward and five reverse consensus primers. The MGP system was compared to the classical HPV general primer system GP5؉/6؉ using a proficiency panel with HPV plasmid dilutions as well as cervical samples from 592 women with low-grade cytological abnormalities. The reference method (GP5؉/6؉) had the desirable high sensitivity (five copies/PCR) for five oncogenic HPV types (HPV type 16 [HPV-16], HPV-18, HPV-56, HPV-59, and HPV-66). The MGP system was able to detect all 14 oncogenic HPV types at five copies/PCR. In the clinical samples, the MGP system detected a significantly higher proportion of women with more than two concomitant HPV infections than did the GP5؉/6؉ system (102/592 women compared to 42/592 women). MGP detected a significantly greater number of infections with HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -42, -43, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, and -70 than did GP5؉/6؉. In summary, the MGP system primers allow a more sensitive amplification of most of the HPV types that are established as oncogenic and had an improved ability to detect multiple concomitant HPV infections.Infection with certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary risk factor for cervical cancer (2). In particular, type-specific persistence of HPV increases the risk for malignant transformation (11,15,17). HPV genotyping is important for most of the major medical indications of HPV testing. For example, genotyping of HPV has been shown to be an accurate indicator of treatment failure in follow-up after treatment for cervical dysplasia (1,22). In cervical screening, HPV genotyping better identifies women at high risk of dysplasia than does a nongenotyping HPV test (6), and monitoring of the types that are associated with the highest risk for cancer is particularly important (3,22). The monitoring of the effect of HPV vaccination requires adequate HPV genotyping to evaluate whether vaccine HPV types disappear from the population and how the prevalence of nonvaccine types is affected (8). Although the clinical validity of HPV genotyping is well documented, no HPV genotyping test has yet been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and no optimal algorithm for risk assessment based on genotyping results in the clinical management of HPV infections has yet been accepted (4).The most widely used HPV genotyping methods are PCR based, using either a series of type-specific PCRs or general primer PCRs followed by a genotyping test. Common general primers, all targeting the well-conserved L 1 gene of the HPV genome, include the GP5ϩ/6ϩ primer pair with a limited number of mismatches against target templates (7), the MY 09/11 primers containing degenerate nucleotides (21), and sets of several forward and reverse primers such as the SPF10 primers, w...