2007
DOI: 10.3126/joim.v27i2.394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of hearing impairment with site of tympanic membrane perforation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings were correlating with other studies, where in those studies have not included the attico-antral perforations in their study [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings were correlating with other studies, where in those studies have not included the attico-antral perforations in their study [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was observed that the greatest hearing loss was found in the big central perforation, whereas least in those of the anterior central perforations, which matched with other studies also [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is in agreement with the experimental works of Voss et al 10 and Mehta et al, 13 who found no effect of location of perforations on the pressure difference at oval and round window and their clinical studies, also showed that there was no difference in HL in anterior and posterior perforations having the same middle ear volume. These observations are contrary to the results of Pannu et al, 16 Bhusal and Shrivastav, 20 Durko and Latkowski, 15 Nepal et al, 17 and Yung. 21 However, in our study, the medium-sized central perforations were found to have 7 to 9 dB greater mean HL than anterior or posterior perforations.…”
Section: Effect Of Site Of Perforationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Bhusal et al found that the highest degree of hearing loss found in big central perforations (45±7.6 dB) then in posterior perforations (43.3±7 dB) and lowest in anterior perforations (31±3 dB). 7 The difference was insignificant between central and posterior perforations (p value > 0.05), but it was significant between anterior and that of central or posterior one (p value <0.05).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 86%