2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of grain boundary connectivity with grain boundary character distribution in austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[51] Recent research supports the fact that the increase in grain size involves a greater amount of CSL boundaries. [52] It has also been demonstrated in Figure 7 that the DOS also follows a similar trend to that of f CSL and f R3 with increasing grain size. Additionally, like the f CSL and f R3 , the DOS remains very low with an average value of 1.7 below the grain size of~16 lm.…”
Section: Grain Size Dos and Csl Boundariessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…[51] Recent research supports the fact that the increase in grain size involves a greater amount of CSL boundaries. [52] It has also been demonstrated in Figure 7 that the DOS also follows a similar trend to that of f CSL and f R3 with increasing grain size. Additionally, like the f CSL and f R3 , the DOS remains very low with an average value of 1.7 below the grain size of~16 lm.…”
Section: Grain Size Dos and Csl Boundariessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…[28] In the case of austenitic stainless steel having low stacking fault energy, the CSL frequency was found to increase with increasing grain size. [29] Interestingly, no definite correlation between CSL frequency and grain size was observed in the previous work. [30] To clarify this point, the relationship between GBCD and grain size was investigated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This figure suggests that the 2-D percolation threshold is approximately 70 % of the CSL frequency and that obviously low percolation is achieved over the threshold in the 2-D GBCD during the present GBE with 304 stainless steel. Previous studies 15,45) have also reported a CSL frequency of around 70 % for the 2-D percolation threshold in austenitic stainless steels (70 % in 304L steel 45) and 72 % in 316 steel 15) ). Monte Carlo simulation studies have dealt with grain boundary percolation.…”
Section: Percolation Of Random Boundaries In Gbemmentioning
confidence: 99%