1989
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(89)90006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
2
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
85
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To relate environmental variables to gradients in composition in nMDS ordinations, we used rotational vector fitting (Faith and Norris 1989). Vector fitting was used to find the direction of the maximum correlation of an environmental variable in an ordination of the vegetation data.…”
Section: Macrophyte Species Distributions Among Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To relate environmental variables to gradients in composition in nMDS ordinations, we used rotational vector fitting (Faith and Norris 1989). Vector fitting was used to find the direction of the maximum correlation of an environmental variable in an ordination of the vegetation data.…”
Section: Macrophyte Species Distributions Among Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faith and Norris (1989) did not consider subsampling approaches or a LR search but showed that rare taxa (not necessarily just LR ones) positively contributed to assemblage-environment relationships in streams of Australia. Cao et al (1998) concluded that rare taxa were not only important in bioassessment, but that their removal from data sets led to an unacceptable loss of ecological information.…”
Section: Evaluating Subsampling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty random starts were made to the analysis and the solution with the lowest stress value selected (see Growns and Davis 1991). (Faith and Norris 1989;Belbin 1993). If they were higher than 5% of those derived from the simulated data, they were considered to be significant at the 0.05 level.…”
Section: Statistical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%