Purpose: This randomized, controlled trial was designed to determine whether the DNA cytometry testing is superior to the conventional cytologic testing for mass cervical cancer screening. Experimental Design: After approval by the institutional ethics review boards from three separate screening centers, a total of 23,993 Chinese women ages 20 to 65 years were randomly assigned into one of the two groups: a DNA cytometry testing group (11,999 women) and a cytologic testing group (11,994 women). Each woman underwent the other testing after first attending the assigned screening test. Women with positive results after assigned testing additionally underwent colposcopy and human papillomaviruses detections, and those with cervical precancerous or cancerous lesions received appropriate treatment. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were adjusted for verification bias. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol ways. Results: In the cytometric DNA testing group, cervical cancer was diagnosed in 40 subjects, compared with 24 subjects in the cytologic testing group [hazard ratio for the detection of advanced cancer in the DNA cytometry testing group, 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27-0.60]. The sensitivity of the DNA cytometry testing for cervical cancer was 91.7% (95% CI, 64.3-95.8), whereas the sensitivity of cytologic testing was 44.5% (95% CI, 25.2-61.3; P = 0.008). The specificity was 54.1% (95% CI, 31.6-69.0) for DNA cytometry testing and 70.6% (95% CI, 46.8-82.5; P = 0.003) for cytologic testing. The sensitivity of both tests used together was 100%, and the specificity was 91.8%. A total of 187 subjects reported mild to severe adverse events after treatment with positive results in 319 women. Conclusions: Our results highlight the benefit of the DNA cytometry testing strategy in mass cervical cancer screening with greater sensitivity and positive predicted value than the conventional cytologic testing in developing settings. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(20):6438-45) Cervical cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among women in low-resource countries. Approximately 320,000 of cervical cancer cases are diagnosed in the developing world every year, of which takes over 80% of all the cases of cervical cancer that are diagnosed annually worldwide (1). As thus, how the cervical cancer is sieved through effective methods during mass population screening is an essential question for global researchers investigating the effectiveness October 14, 2009; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1689 and accuracy of currently available means-particularly for predicting the emergence of the cancer after a single round of screening.Cervical cytologic testing with the Bethesda System has proved to be one of the most successful examples of cancer screening over the simple Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test and has resulted in significant decreases in incidence and mortality from cervical cancer (2). Besides, numerous studies recommended that human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is an appropriate method when...