2012
DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.3.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Conventional and Conformal Plan Parameters for Predicting Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients Treated with Breast Cancer

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the conventional plan parameters and dosimetric parameters obtained from conformal radiotherapy (RT) planning, and between these parameters and radiation pneumontitis (RP) incidence.MethodsClinical and dosimetric data of 122 patients that were treated with mastectomy and adjuvant 3D conformal RT (39% received 2-field RT [2-FRT], and in addition, 61% received 4-field RT [4-FRT]) were retrospectively analyzed. Central lung depth (CLD), maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the patient population in the present study were similar to previous studies. Similar to our study, patients in previous studies had different types of surgery (BCS or mastectomy) for left- or right-sided breast cancer ( 16 , 17 , 21 ). Possible causes for these discrepancies can be associated with patient-specific anatomy, variation in the shape of the anterior chest wall, variation in the patient’s position, and patient motion related to breathing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The characteristics of the patient population in the present study were similar to previous studies. Similar to our study, patients in previous studies had different types of surgery (BCS or mastectomy) for left- or right-sided breast cancer ( 16 , 17 , 21 ). Possible causes for these discrepancies can be associated with patient-specific anatomy, variation in the shape of the anterior chest wall, variation in the patient’s position, and patient motion related to breathing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Teh et al found a strong correlation between CLD and ipsilateral lung V 10-40Gy in patients treated with 2FRT (n = 51), whereas no statistically significant correlation between CLD and ipsilateral lung V 10-40Gy was observed in patients treated with 3FRT (n = 38) ( 16 ). In another similar study, Onal et al have also reported that although there is a correlation between ipsilateral lung volume irradiated and the CLD during two-field tangential breast radiotherapy, this correlation is reduced once supraclavicular fields are added for nodal irradiation ( 21 ). By contrast, with 3FRT, the results of our study show that there is a moderate correlation between CLD and ipsilateral lung V 5-10Gy , as well as a good correlation of CLD and ipsilateral lung V 20Gy , as observable in Table 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past, telecobalt therapy [ 11 ] caused pneumonitis in up to 35% of all treated breast cancer patients, whereas incidences reported for modern CT(computer tomography)-based photon therapy range from 1% [ 12 ] and 4% [ 13 ], 12% [ 14 , 15 ] to 21% [ 16 ]. However, the correlation between normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) and dosimetry parameters, such as extent of co-irradiated lung tissue [ 17 ], central lung distance [ 18 ], and mean lung dose [ 19 , 20 ], is still discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Thus, for whole-breast irradiation, standard tangential RT is gradually being replaced by IMRT forward or inverse planning techniques. 5 The field-in-field (FIF) technique, also named as forward IMRT planning, is a simple preferred method that can be performed at any center that has a multileaf collimator (MLC). 6,7 Although the FIF technique achieves a more homogenous dose distribution compared with standard tangential field RT, IMRT plans can be more susceptible to set-up errors and breast shape changes because IMRT plans contain nonglancing segments.…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%