1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.29.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation effects in ferromagnetism of transition metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
4

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These can be attributed to the overestimated exchange splitting and its incorrect nearly isotropic behavior over the Brillouin zone in the LSDA. As pointed out by Oles and Stollhoff 79 and by Liebsch, 80 the large exchange splitting in the LSDA is due to the neglect of strong correlation effects within the 3d states and anisotropic exchange. Conse- …”
Section: A Single-particle Stoner Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These can be attributed to the overestimated exchange splitting and its incorrect nearly isotropic behavior over the Brillouin zone in the LSDA. As pointed out by Oles and Stollhoff 79 and by Liebsch, 80 the large exchange splitting in the LSDA is due to the neglect of strong correlation effects within the 3d states and anisotropic exchange. Conse- …”
Section: A Single-particle Stoner Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While the later behavior may be expected and in fact is observed experimentally [13], the magnetization increase at the interface Fe atoms characterized by a lower coordination of Fe atoms is not obvious. We interpret it as a manifestation of electron correlation effects which increase local moments at Fe atoms when the kinetic energy of 3d electrons is decreased by a lower Fe coordination [17]. In agreement with this interpretation, the moment enhancement at the interface becomes even more pronounced in the extreme case of a single iron ML, where Fe atoms have only platinum coordination and their magnetic moments are increased up to the level of saturation m 3.0 µ B , i.e., by 35% over the bulk iron value m Fe 2.2 µ B (the magnetic moments of Pt atoms at the interface are here quite small m Pt 0.3 µ B ).…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[31] and in addition we use a semiempirical formula C 4B for Racah parameters. With this Ansatz one finds J d = 3B + C ≈ 7B for a pure t 2g system [32]. The J d,µν elements concerning e g orbitals are finite and fixed again using the entries from Table I in Ref.…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%