1990
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.42.7065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation dimension and systematic geometric effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the chaos detection algorithm, the original data set was divided into 10 subsets of 1000 peak intervals each. The original data set size of Ϸ12 000 agrees well with estimates of the minimal number of data points necessary to identify nonlinear structures [21][22][23][24] : 10 2ϩ0.4d or 10 d , where d is the dimension of the structure under study.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For the chaos detection algorithm, the original data set was divided into 10 subsets of 1000 peak intervals each. The original data set size of Ϸ12 000 agrees well with estimates of the minimal number of data points necessary to identify nonlinear structures [21][22][23][24] : 10 2ϩ0.4d or 10 d , where d is the dimension of the structure under study.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 54%
“…One of the most common criticisms on the use of correlation dimension method (especially the GrassbergerProcaccia algorithm) for hydrologic (and other real) time series is that it significantly underestimates the dimension when the data size is small (e.g. Nerenberg and Essex, 1990;Schertzer et al, 2002). Many studies have already addressed this issue through various means (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each series has 1000 data points, which is greater than the number of points required (10 2+0.4 * m =650, where m=2 for the Lorenz time series) for the correct estimation of the correlation exponent of the Lorenz time series (e.g. Nerenberg and Essex, 1990). The plot of Ln C(r) vs. Ln r described in Sect.…”
Section: Results With Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large scaling region may be better delineated when a large data set is used which, in turn, results in a better estimation of the slope. Nerenberg and Essex (1990) suggested that the minimum number of data points required for the correct estimation of the correlation exponent is N min =10 2+0.4m , where m is the embedding dimension. The presence of noise may affect the scaling behavior and may tend to make the slope of the Ln C(r) vs. Ln r plot larger for small values of r resulting in an overestimation of the correlation exponent.…”
Section: Correlation Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%