2020
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1732994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Database of 60 Cross-Disciplinary Surveys and Cognitive Tasks Assessing Self-Regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although general self-regulation and emotion regulation share functional overlaps, these constructs are nonetheless etiologically and biologically distinguishable, and are differentially associated with psychopathology 52 . Thus, the Go/No-Go task was used to measure a function that is separable to that measured by the DERS-16, supported by the finding that cognitive and behavioural measures of selfregulation are weakly correlated and provide unique information 53 . Each trial began with a fixation cross ('+') presented in the centre of the screen for 50 ms followed by a blank screen for 150 ms.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although general self-regulation and emotion regulation share functional overlaps, these constructs are nonetheless etiologically and biologically distinguishable, and are differentially associated with psychopathology 52 . Thus, the Go/No-Go task was used to measure a function that is separable to that measured by the DERS-16, supported by the finding that cognitive and behavioural measures of selfregulation are weakly correlated and provide unique information 53 . Each trial began with a fixation cross ('+') presented in the centre of the screen for 50 ms followed by a blank screen for 150 ms.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies conducted with larger samples of undergraduates found a curvilinear relationship in which emotion-related impulsivity and response inhibition were related at higher levels ( Dekker and Johnson, 2018 ; Johnson et al, 2016 ), we were unable to replicate that pattern in this small sample. The inability to replicate the association between self-reported and behavioural impulsivity coheres with an abundance of studies documenting poor convergence between self-report and behavioural impulsivity ( Duckworth and Kern, 2011 ; Mazza et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Using the framework of the CNDS theory and the statistical method of Bayesian network modeling, we have shown that obesity is predicted by a profile of neurobehaviors including enhanced impulsivity, impaired affective state, lower levels of motivation, and poor self-image. Several previous correlational and meta-analytic studies have established that overweight/obesity are related to impaired neurobehaviors including cognitive flexibility, short-term memory, fluid intelligence, impulsivity, and social functioning (Emery & Levine, 2017; Gray et al, 2020; Hovens et al, 2019; Mazza et al, 2020; Olivo et al, 2019; Vainik et al, 2013, 2018; Wood et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2018). The novelty of our data set is that we have provided a side-by-side comparison of a variety of neurobehaviors along with eating and exercise outcomes, establishing a model that predicts obesity with an accuracy of 64.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%