2014
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between viral production and carbon mineralization under nitrate-reducing conditions in aquifer sediment

Abstract: A variety of microbially mediated metabolic pathways impact biogeochemical cycling in terrestrial subsurface environments. However, the role that viruses have in influencing microbial mortality and microbial community structure is poorly understood. Here we investigated the production of viruses and change in microbial community structure within shallow alluvial aquifer sediment slurries amended with 13 C-labeled acetate and nitrate. Biostimulation resulted in production of viruses concurrent with acetate oxid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, archaeal communities were thought to be typical of (or limited to) extreme environments; reports on the omnipresence of archaea in other environments became available only fairly recently (Chaban, Ng & Jarrell, 2006). This led to the introduction of terms such as 'virus-to-prokaryote ratio (VPR)' (De Corte et al, 2012) and 'virus-to-cell ratio' (Engelhardt et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2014). Herein, we suggest adoption of the term 'virus-to-prokaryote ratio' (VPR), as the most appropriate when considering the relative importance of bacterial and archaeal communities and the related virosphere, as compared to eukaryotic communities and their viruses [although use of 'prokaryote' to designate 'non-eukaryotes' remains controversial (Pace, 2006)].…”
Section: Introduction: the Virus-to-prokaryote Ratio -Definition Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Initially, archaeal communities were thought to be typical of (or limited to) extreme environments; reports on the omnipresence of archaea in other environments became available only fairly recently (Chaban, Ng & Jarrell, 2006). This led to the introduction of terms such as 'virus-to-prokaryote ratio (VPR)' (De Corte et al, 2012) and 'virus-to-cell ratio' (Engelhardt et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2014). Herein, we suggest adoption of the term 'virus-to-prokaryote ratio' (VPR), as the most appropriate when considering the relative importance of bacterial and archaeal communities and the related virosphere, as compared to eukaryotic communities and their viruses [although use of 'prokaryote' to designate 'non-eukaryotes' remains controversial (Pace, 2006)].…”
Section: Introduction: the Virus-to-prokaryote Ratio -Definition Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Filamentous phages infect a variety of mostly Gram-negative bacteria without killing the host, and they play a significant role in the host's physiological characteristics such as growth, fragility, acid resistance, swarming motility, toxin production, biofilm formation and lateral gene transfer (Mai-Prochnow et al, 2015). Several reports have identified filamentous phages in the subsurface sediment, which was suggested to be linked to carbon mineralization and to confer a competitive advantage to the nitrate-reducing Pseudomonas host (Pan et al, 2014). Moreover, the Pseudoalteromonas phage f327 was shown to be prevalent in Arctic sea ice and to enhance motility and chemotaxis for improved host survival (Yu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally it has been assumed that subsurface microbial processes are dependent on reduced C originating from photosynthesis (represented by "Marilyn" in Figure 4A). Hence the surface would necessarily dictate subsurface characteristics (Culver et al, 1985;Baker et al, 2000;Foulquier et al, 2010;Akob and Küsel, 2011;Foulquier et al, 2011;Pan et al, 2014; Figure 4A). However, reduced carbon can also enter soils via microbial non-photoautotrophic CO 2 fixation (represented by "Elvis" in Figure 4B) and this carbon can be important to soil microenvironments despite its relatively small contribution to fixed C (0.05% of soil organic carbon; Miltner et al, 2004Miltner et al, , 2005.…”
Section: How Do Surface Conditions Like Land Use and Events And Locmentioning
confidence: 99%