2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2680-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between three-dimensional and cross-sectional characteristics of ideal grain growth: large-scale phase-field simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stereological analysis was performed manually to exclude the measurement of unwanted artefacts in imperfect metallographic preparation. To solve numerical calculations of local plastic deformation, it was necessary, similarly to Miyoshi, E. et al, to use a mathematical model created by the Monte Carlo method (Miyoshi, 2018). For verification of the results obtained experimentally, simulations were implemented in the Deform simulation program like Hatala et al (2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stereological analysis was performed manually to exclude the measurement of unwanted artefacts in imperfect metallographic preparation. To solve numerical calculations of local plastic deformation, it was necessary, similarly to Miyoshi, E. et al, to use a mathematical model created by the Monte Carlo method (Miyoshi, 2018). For verification of the results obtained experimentally, simulations were implemented in the Deform simulation program like Hatala et al (2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which the 3D microstructural characteristics can be obtained from cross-sectional observations remains unclear. Miyoshi, E. et al also pay attention to this problem, claiming that there additionally exists some disagreement as to whether a cross-sectional view of 3D grain growth can be fully approximated by 2D growth (Miyoshi, 2018). To clarify the development of the texture, it is important to understand the deformation process and it cannot be achieved without knowing the changes that occur throughout the volume of material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain size of fine-grained areas only, abnormal grains were not included in these values, was calculated by the linear intercept method (EN 623-3) and then multiplied by a factor of 1.56. 13 The size of AG was calculated according to the following equation and then multiplied by a factor of 1.2 14 :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain size of fine‐grained areas only, abnormal grains were not included in these values, was calculated by the linear intercept method (EN 623‐3) and then multiplied by a factor of 1.56 13 . The size of AG was calculated according to the following equation and then multiplied by a factor of 1.2 14 : dbadbreak=4Sπ1/2\begin{equation}d\; = {\left( {\frac{{4S}}{\pi }} \right)^{1/2}}\;\;\end{equation}where d$d$ is the grain size and S$S$ is the grain area obtained from the SEM image. The crystallographic orientation of the grains was evaluated by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the benefit of rapid developments in high-performance computing, recent phase-field simulations have enabled significant contributions toward elucidating various metallurgical processes, including grain growth. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Most phase-field studies on grain growth have focused on ideal grain growth under the conditions of isotropic grain boundary energy and mobility. However, in actual materials, these grain boundary properties are usually strongly anisotropic, with largely different values for each grain boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%