Correlation Between the Variability of Different Obesity Indices and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Populations in Taiwan
Zhenzhen Sun,
Kun Wang,
Chuan Yun
et al.
Abstract:Purpose
To investigate the association of five obesity indices and the variability of these indices with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes and compare the predictive validity of these markers for the risk of DKD in this large longitudinal cohort study.
Patients and Methods
A total of 2659 patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have DKD were enrolled between 2006 and 2019 at Lee’s United Clinic in Taiwan. Data were collected for each subje… Show more
“…Abstracts of the remaining 1,172 records were searched, and full texts of 140 studies were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 17 studies were included in the review ( 8-10 , 12 , 16-28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of CKD etiology is further compounded by the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), a condition that singularly accelerates the progression of nephropathy, and is a primary cause of CKD in numerous regions ( 11 ). The close relationship between hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and lipid disorders further strengthens the need to evaluate the relationship between LAP index and CKD in diabetic subpopulations ( 12 ), and to conduct subgroup analyses based on the presence of DM. These analyses may improve risk stratification and allow for the tailoring of preventive measures in these high-risk cohorts.…”
Diabetes mellitus and lipid metabolism disorders are increasingly recognized as key contributors to the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index, a novel marker of lipid accumulation, has potential implications for CKD risk assessment. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between LAP index and CKD, with an emphasis on varying impacts in diabetic and non-diabetic populations. A comprehensive search for relevant publications was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases, and a meta-analysis of 17 studies was performed to investigate the relationship between LAP index and CKD. The random-effects inverse-variance model employing the DerSimonian-Laird estimator for τ² was utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with calculations of the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic OR. The pooled OR for the association between higher quintiles or tertiles of LAP index and CKD was 1.098 (95% CI: 1.043-1.152), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=91.2%) and evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association in non-diabetic (OR=2.422, 95% CI: 1.802-3.042) compared with diabetic patients (OR=1.018, 95% CI: 0.993-1.043). The diagnostic accuracy of LAP index for CKD was moderate (AUROC= 0.64), with sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.58 and 0.63, respectively. In conclusion, in the present study, LAP index demonstrated a modest but significant association with CKD, particularly in non-diabetic patients. Despite its moderate diagnostic accuracy, the LAP index could serve as a valuable tool in CKD risk stratification, particularly when integrated with other clinical markers.
“…Abstracts of the remaining 1,172 records were searched, and full texts of 140 studies were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 17 studies were included in the review ( 8-10 , 12 , 16-28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of CKD etiology is further compounded by the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), a condition that singularly accelerates the progression of nephropathy, and is a primary cause of CKD in numerous regions ( 11 ). The close relationship between hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and lipid disorders further strengthens the need to evaluate the relationship between LAP index and CKD in diabetic subpopulations ( 12 ), and to conduct subgroup analyses based on the presence of DM. These analyses may improve risk stratification and allow for the tailoring of preventive measures in these high-risk cohorts.…”
Diabetes mellitus and lipid metabolism disorders are increasingly recognized as key contributors to the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index, a novel marker of lipid accumulation, has potential implications for CKD risk assessment. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between LAP index and CKD, with an emphasis on varying impacts in diabetic and non-diabetic populations. A comprehensive search for relevant publications was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases, and a meta-analysis of 17 studies was performed to investigate the relationship between LAP index and CKD. The random-effects inverse-variance model employing the DerSimonian-Laird estimator for τ² was utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with calculations of the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic OR. The pooled OR for the association between higher quintiles or tertiles of LAP index and CKD was 1.098 (95% CI: 1.043-1.152), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=91.2%) and evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association in non-diabetic (OR=2.422, 95% CI: 1.802-3.042) compared with diabetic patients (OR=1.018, 95% CI: 0.993-1.043). The diagnostic accuracy of LAP index for CKD was moderate (AUROC= 0.64), with sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.58 and 0.63, respectively. In conclusion, in the present study, LAP index demonstrated a modest but significant association with CKD, particularly in non-diabetic patients. Despite its moderate diagnostic accuracy, the LAP index could serve as a valuable tool in CKD risk stratification, particularly when integrated with other clinical markers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.