2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-019-5097-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between Structural, Magnetic and Dielectric Properties of Microwave Sintered Ni-Zn-Al Nanoferrites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The volume of the unit cell (V = a 3 Å 3 ) and specific surface area (S = 6000/ρ x × D XRD ) were calculated 17 that are shown in Table 1 2). 16,18 The bond angles θ 1 and θ 2 represent the A−O−B interaction between the voids, whereas θ 3 and θ 4 signify the bond angles between the B−O−B exchange interactions, and θ 5 corresponds to the A−O−A interactions inside the complexes. 19 The variations of these angles attribute that cations are rearranged with Al contents with different superexchange interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 The volume of the unit cell (V = a 3 Å 3 ) and specific surface area (S = 6000/ρ x × D XRD ) were calculated 17 that are shown in Table 1 2). 16,18 The bond angles θ 1 and θ 2 represent the A−O−B interaction between the voids, whereas θ 3 and θ 4 signify the bond angles between the B−O−B exchange interactions, and θ 5 corresponds to the A−O−A interactions inside the complexes. 19 The variations of these angles attribute that cations are rearranged with Al contents with different superexchange interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of bond angles (θ 1 , θ 2 , θ 3 , θ 4 , θ 5 ) with compositions signifies that the magnetic interactions (A–O–A, A–O–B, B–O–B) weaken and strengthen between the cations and anions inside the sublattices (Table ). , The bond angles θ 1 and θ 2 represent the A–O–B interaction between the voids, whereas θ 3 and θ 4 signify the bond angles between the B–O–B exchange interactions, and θ 5 corresponds to the A–O–A interactions inside the complexes . The variations of these angles attribute that cations are rearranged with Al contents with different superexchange interactions …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of Cu ions in the sample doped with Cu resulted in a slight increase in the lattice parameter (a), indicating lattice distortion. Furthermore, the sample doped with Copper showed higher crystallite size calculated using Scherrer's formula [10], with an increase of 26.40 nm in comparison to 19.43 nm in the non-doped sample. This observation implies that the addition of Cu dopants had an impact on the formation and receiving of the crystallographic domains.…”
Section: Xrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(Abu-elsaad and Abdel 2019). Moreover, starting from Ag + contents (i.e., x ≥ 0.2), both the octahedral and tetrahedral site bands move toward higher wavenumbers due to the substitution of greater atomic weight Ag + compared with Cu 2+ (Ega et al 2019). FT-IR measurements also revealed significant bands at 3450 cm -1 due to O-H groups and the samples' development of cubic spinel phase is attributed to absorption bands in the region of 1300 cm -1 (Abu-elsaad and Abdel 2019), (Abdel Maksoud et al 2020) .…”
Section: Fourier-transform Infrared (Ft-ir) Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%