1985
DOI: 10.1159/000132099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between sexual phenotype and X-chromosome inactivation pattern in the X*XY wood lemming

Abstract: Replication patterns of the X chromosomes were studied in X*XY wood lemmings with male and female phenotypes. The wild-type X was late replicating (ie, inactivated) in all cells of the X*XY female, whereas the mutated X* was late replicating in all cells of the X*XY male. These findings are compared with those obtained in sex-reversed (Sxr) mice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Winking et al (1981) suggested that the variable phenotypic expression was a consequence of non-random inactivation of X and X*, with the two types either in unequal proportion or unequally distributed. Support for the non-random inactivation hypothesis was received from studies of the replication patterns of the X chromosomes in fibroblast cultures initiated from one X* XY male and one X* XY female (Schempp et al 1985). The normal X was late-replicating (i.e.…”
Section: Why Is the Wood Lemming Such A Good Model For Studies In Sex Determination ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winking et al (1981) suggested that the variable phenotypic expression was a consequence of non-random inactivation of X and X*, with the two types either in unequal proportion or unequally distributed. Support for the non-random inactivation hypothesis was received from studies of the replication patterns of the X chromosomes in fibroblast cultures initiated from one X* XY male and one X* XY female (Schempp et al 1985). The normal X was late-replicating (i.e.…”
Section: Why Is the Wood Lemming Such A Good Model For Studies In Sex Determination ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XX, XX*, and X*Y, due to the presence of a third sex chromosome, named X*, that carries a feminizing mutation that prevents the initiation of the male sex-determining program in X*Y individuals. Although limited investigation seemed to suggest random X inactivation of either the X or X* in XX* females (H. Winking, personal communication, in Schempp et al (1985)), other results showed more striking patterns, with complete nonrandom X or X* inactivation (100%) in specimens with numerically aberrant X*XY sex chromosome constitution (Schempp et al 1985). Recently, a novel case of unusual mammalian sex determination system was described in the African pygmy mouse, Mus minutoides, a close relative of the house mouse (Veyrunes et al 2010;Rahmoun et al 2014;Zhao et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these types of variations suggest that chromosome rearrangements can play a major role in speciation, they also present a conundrum for biologists: apparently similar types of rearrangements in humans, laboratory mice, and other mammalian species often result in sterility, especially in the carrier males (for review see de Boer and de Jong, 1989;Speed, 1989). Questions about "unusual" mammalian sex chromosomes have been a major theme of Karl Fredga's career, whether the abnormality can be attributed to a gonosome (sex) chromosome-autosome rearrangement (Fredga, 1965) or large blocks of heterochromatin (Ashley et al, 1989;Schempp et al, 1985). His interest has ranged from the molecular effects of "unusual" sex chromosomes on sex determination (Liu et al, 2001) and X inactivation (Schempp et al, 1985), to cytological effects on meiosis (Akhverdyan and Fredga, 2001;Ashley et al, 1989), to the "macro" effects on populations (Fredga and Jaarola, 1997), up to and including the "super-macro" effects on speciation and evolution (Bilton et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%