2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between Selected Prognostic Factors and Postoperative Course in Liver Transplant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the alcoholic etiology of liver disease, it is worth noticing that some authors have raised the question of cirrhotic patients due to alcoholism having a better outcome without transplantation than cirrhotics due to viral hepatitis (2) , and others have found that alcoholic patients had more post-transplant complications (30) . Both these remarks could reinforce that the reported trend in listing and transplanting less alcoholic patients might be positive to the system as a whole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning the alcoholic etiology of liver disease, it is worth noticing that some authors have raised the question of cirrhotic patients due to alcoholism having a better outcome without transplantation than cirrhotics due to viral hepatitis (2) , and others have found that alcoholic patients had more post-transplant complications (30) . Both these remarks could reinforce that the reported trend in listing and transplanting less alcoholic patients might be positive to the system as a whole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were consecutively enrolled and divided into two groups, one including the cases enlisted from January 2004 to December 2004, representing the pre-MELD group, in which time in list was the criterion for receiving an organ, and the other including those enlisted from June 2006 to December 2007, representing the post-MELD group, when the severity of the cases, determined by the MELD score (22,24) , became the condition used to allocate the livers (30) . Patients studied were listed by all 4 major liver transplantation teams of the State.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional nonimmune factors that affect graft survival include age of the recipient, length of time without blood for the graft, infection with cytomegalovirus and toxicity of the immunosuppressants, all of which can cause degradation of the allograft and chronic rejection [14]. In addition, a recent study suggests that the original cause of the damaged liver also influences the outcome of the graft [18]. Immune destruction is thought to target the small arterial intima and smooth muscle of the liver and induce hyperplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most useful predictive factors for 1-year survival were urea/ creatinine and liver function tests. (Patkowski et al, 2009). In addition, transplantation of a liver with >25% steatosis was a risk factor for the development of a biliary complication (Baccarani et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%