2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-020-00514-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between Rhipicephalus microplus ticks and Anaplasma marginale infection in various cattle breeds in Brazil

Abstract: Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be selfarchived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed median counts reported here are similar of other data sets available on the literature. For instance, Martins et al [18] performed repeated tick counts on 11 Brangus and 12 Nellore growing bulls raised on a commercial farm located at Mato Grosso do Sul -Brazil. The animals were naturally infested and no prophylactic treatment was performed [18].…”
Section: Environmental Parasite Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed median counts reported here are similar of other data sets available on the literature. For instance, Martins et al [18] performed repeated tick counts on 11 Brangus and 12 Nellore growing bulls raised on a commercial farm located at Mato Grosso do Sul -Brazil. The animals were naturally infested and no prophylactic treatment was performed [18].…”
Section: Environmental Parasite Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Martins et al [18] performed repeated tick counts on 11 Brangus and 12 Nellore growing bulls raised on a commercial farm located at Mato Grosso do Sul -Brazil. The animals were naturally infested and no prophylactic treatment was performed [18]. The authors observed 45.51 ± 20.91 and 10.08 ± 2.00 (mean ± standard deviation) ticks on the Brangus and Nellore animals, respectively, and this numbers represent the tick count on the entire animal (both left and right sides).…”
Section: Environmental Parasite Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a practice of multiplying tick counts by two to estimate the tick burden in the entire animal [18]. For the modified McMaster technique, a multiplicative factor can also be used to infer on the animal's parasite burden.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. marginale is a kind of Anaplasma, which can cause hemolytic anemia, miscarriage, yield loss and death in cattle [10]. According to statistics, in Brazil, the annual loss caused by parasites affecting cattle industry chain production is $13.96 billion [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 20 tick species, mainly of the genera Rhipicephalusand Dermacentor, have been reported as vectors of anaplasmosis in bovine species [13]. A. marginale is a part of the bovine tick-borne pathogens (TBDs), together with B. bigemina and B. bovis, it has an economic impact through direct costs related to mortality and morbidity and indirect costs related to disease treatment and prevention [10,14]. In China, A. marginale was rst discovered in cattle in Hebei Province in 1987, more than 30 years ago [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%