2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2019)025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between $$ {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} $$ and top quark FCNC decays in leptoquark models

Abstract: Some interpretations of R D ( * ) anomaly in B meson decay using leptoquark (LQ) models can also generate top quark decays through Flavor Changing Neutral Current (FCNC). In this work we focus on two LQs, i.e. scalar S 1 and vector U 1 which are both singlet under the SU (2) L gauge group in the Standard Model (SM). We investigate their implications on the 3-body top FCNC decays t → c i j at tree level and the 2-body t → cV at one-loop level, with being the SM leptons and V = γ, Z, g being the SM gauge bosons.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As leptoquarks, they appear together in models which tackle the flavour anomalies in the R K ( * ) and R D ( * ) observables [38][39][40][41][42]. S 1 coupling as a leptoquark is able to explain R D ( * ) (see, for example [43,44]) while S 3 coupling as a leptoquark is able explain R K ( * ) [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. However, in order to generate neutrino mass in this model, the fermion content of the chosen effective operators forces us to have one of either S 1 or S 3 coupling as a leptoquark, and the other as a diquark.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As leptoquarks, they appear together in models which tackle the flavour anomalies in the R K ( * ) and R D ( * ) observables [38][39][40][41][42]. S 1 coupling as a leptoquark is able to explain R D ( * ) (see, for example [43,44]) while S 3 coupling as a leptoquark is able explain R K ( * ) [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. However, in order to generate neutrino mass in this model, the fermion content of the chosen effective operators forces us to have one of either S 1 or S 3 coupling as a leptoquark, and the other as a diquark.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate how L np may be generated by renormalizable NP interactions, we look at the leptoquark (LQ) scenario. Amongst those that have been explored in the literature [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], with couplings to SM fermions which conserve baryon and lepton numbers and respect SM gauge symmetries, the LQs (with their SU(3) c × SU(2) L × U(1) Y assignments) that can bring about L np are S 1 3 , 1, 4/3 , S 2 (3, 2, 7/6),S 2 (3, 2, 1/6), and S 3 3 , 3, 1/3 , which are spinless, and V 1 (3, 1, 2/3), V 2 3 , 2, 5/6 , and V 3 (3, 3, 2/3), which have spin 1. The SU(2) L doublets (triplets) S 2 ,S 2 , and V 2 (S 3 and V 3 ) each have two (three) components having different electric charges.…”
Section: Leptoquark Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many extensions of the SM do not preserve lepton-flavor number, and the corresponding parameters have been tightly restricted by the negative outcomes of the various searches conducted so far in the decays of kaons, B mesons, and charged leptons, among others [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The most common examples of NP exhibiting LFV include leptoquarks [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], heavy neutrinos [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], gauged U(1) extensions of the SM with their associated Z gauge bosons [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], and multi-Higgs models [42][43][44][45][46][47]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45]. Models with one or more LQ states, which are colored bosons and couple to both quarks and leptons, are one of the most popular scenarios to explain the R D ( * ) and R K ( * ) anomalies [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. In ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%