1992
DOI: 10.5035/nishiseisai.41.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between Pelvic Inclination and Radiological Shape of the Pelvic Cavity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The backward pelvic tilting angle was 16 degrees in the male patient and 24 13 to 40 degrees in females in this study. On the other hand, the normal tilting angle was reported as 19.47 6.26 degrees in the male and 24.4 5.93 in females 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backward pelvic tilting angle was 16 degrees in the male patient and 24 13 to 40 degrees in females in this study. On the other hand, the normal tilting angle was reported as 19.47 6.26 degrees in the male and 24.4 5.93 in females 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real wear values were compensated by calculating the difference between the measured diameter of the metal head on radiography and the actual diameter of the inserted femoral head. Pelvic inclination was measured according to the method of Doiguchi et al [9]. Horizontal diameter (T) and vertical diameter (L) of the pelvic cavity on radiography were measured, and pelvic inclination was calculated using the following formulae: −67 × L/T + 55.7 for male hips and −69 × L/T + 61.6 for female hips (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minor axis of the cup was designated as D 1 and the major axis was designated as D 2 on AP pelvic radiographs, and the angle of anteversion ( α ) was calculated as α = sin −1 ⁡ D 1 / D 2 + 5°. The PTA was calculated using the method of Doiguchi [ 5 , 9 ]. The lateral diameter ( T ) and longitudinal diameter ( L ) of the pelvic cavity were measured on AP pelvic radiographs, and the PTA was calculated as −67 × L / T + 55.7° for men and −69 × L / T + 61.6° for women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%