2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between PEAK relational training system and one-word picture vocabulary tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…McKeel, Rowsey, Dixon et al, reported a 92.3% agreement on PEAK‐DTA, the Receptive One‐Word Picture Vocabulary Test (ROWPVT‐4), and the Expressive One‐Word‐Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT‐4) administrations when a primary assessor and secondary observer simultaneously collected data on 30% of assessments. However, according to these authors, IOA data were analyzed collectively, thus making it impossible to separate IOA for PEAK‐DTA from the ROWPVT‐4 and the EOWPVT‐4.…”
Section: Conclusion Regarding Peak‐dtm and Peak‐dtamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McKeel, Rowsey, Dixon et al, reported a 92.3% agreement on PEAK‐DTA, the Receptive One‐Word Picture Vocabulary Test (ROWPVT‐4), and the Expressive One‐Word‐Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT‐4) administrations when a primary assessor and secondary observer simultaneously collected data on 30% of assessments. However, according to these authors, IOA data were analyzed collectively, thus making it impossible to separate IOA for PEAK‐DTA from the ROWPVT‐4 and the EOWPVT‐4.…”
Section: Conclusion Regarding Peak‐dtm and Peak‐dtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before moving forward with my critical review, I must make clear that any line of research is an effortful undertaking and Dixon and his colleagues must be commended for their efforts in pursuing empirical support for PEAK. As is noted in the literature, among the language assessment and curriculum tools available to behavior analysts, PEAK has the most published psychometric evidence (see, e.g., Dixon, Stanley, Belisle, & Rowsey, and McKeel, Rowsey, Dixon, & Daar, ). A critique—such as the present paper—is a relatively simple task, whereas actually producing research is often a lengthy, effortful, and difficult endeavor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer-Reviewed Support for PEAK There are several peerreviewed, published articles examining the effectiveness and psychometric properties of PEAK-DT, PEAK-G, PEAK-E, and PEAK-T (e.g., Belisle, Dixon, Stanley, Munoz, & Daar, 2016;Dixon, Belisle, Whiting, & Rowsey, 2014a;Dixon et al, 2014b;Dixon, Whiting, Rowsey, & Belisle, 2014c;McKeel, Dixon, Daar, Rowsey, & Szekely, 2015a;McKeel, Rowsey, Belisle, Dixon, & Szekely, 2015b;McKeel, Rowsey, Dixon, & Daar, 2014;Rowsey, Belisle, & Dixon, 2014). PEAK has demonstrated reliability (e.g., PEAK-DT: Dixon, Stanley, Belisle, & Rowsey, 2016), internal validity (e.g., PEAK-DT: Rowsey et al, 2014;PEAK-G: Dixon et al, 2017b), and external validity (PEAK-DT: Dixon et al, 2014b;Dixon et al, 2014b;Malkin, Dixon, Speelman, & Luke, 2017;McKeel et al, 2014;PEAK-G: Dixon et al, 2015;Dunkel-Jackson, 2016). Further research from Dixon and colleagues has explored the relationship between age and PEAK scores of both normative and ASD samples for PEAK-DT (Dixon et al, 2014a) and PEAK-G (Dixon et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Peakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topographies of operant skills across all assessment items include socially valid intervention targets (e.g., tacting community helpers, manding for preferred items), which were guided by the Common Core State Standards in the United States (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, ). Research following the publication of the PEAK‐DTA has supported the construct validity of the assessment (Dixon, Belisle, Whiting, & Rowsey, ; Dixon, Stanley, Belisle, & Rowsey, ; Rowsey, Belisle, & Dixon, ), and correlations have been reported between the PEAK‐DTA and measures of school readiness (Dixon, Carman, et al, ), vocabulary (McKeel, Rowsey, Dixon, & Daar, ), and intelligence (Dixon, Whiting, Rowsey, & Belisle, ). In addition to the PEAK‐DTA, PEAK‐DT contains a 184‐program curriculum that directly targets skills identified in the PEAK‐DTA (Dixon, Whiting, & Daar, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%