2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) results and polymer modification of binder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This term was found to be inadequate in describing the rutting performance of bitumens. Developments led to the existence of Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) test [32]. MSCR test was run on RTFOT aged samples in accordance to ASTM D7405-08 using the dynamic shear rheometer [33].…”
Section: Rheological Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This term was found to be inadequate in describing the rutting performance of bitumens. Developments led to the existence of Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) test [32]. MSCR test was run on RTFOT aged samples in accordance to ASTM D7405-08 using the dynamic shear rheometer [33].…”
Section: Rheological Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, D'Angelo [7] proposed multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test and the non-recoverable creep compliance J nr and the percent recovery were used to evaluate binder's high temperature properties. The MSCR test has been used to characterize the extent of dispersion of styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) in polymer-modified asphalts (PMA) and MSCR can be considered as an alternative to Elastic Recovery test, typically run by many highway agencies [8,9]. The validation of the MSCR compliance value J nr to rutting demonstrated that the MSCR test provides a better correlation to mixture rutting than the existing Superpave binder criteria [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, G*/sin δ cannot be taken for an effective evaluation index for high-temperature performance of asphalt binder. In recent years, Repeated Creep Recovery (RCR) test and Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) test are considered to be more accurate methods (Delgadillo et al 2006;Masad et al 2009;Eric et al 2014). Unlike the controlled-strain mode by general rheological tests, RCR and MSCR tests both adopt controlled-stress mode, and perform a test cycle consisting 1s of loading and 9s of unloading to detect the recovery and residual shear strains of tested sample (Fig.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%