Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between ground motion intensity measures and seismic damage of 3D R/C buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the study of the correlation between the ground motion IM and the structural response, Lucchini et al [46] and Kostinakis et al [47] studied the complex process of using a single value to characterize the IMs corresponding to the horizontal components with two-dimensional or three-dimensional ground motion inputting. Based on the analysis results of Scheme 1 in the MSA method, the influence of the four different characterization methods on the aleatory randomness is investigated with the PGA selected as the IM.…”
Section: Characterization Methods Of Bidirectional Ground Motion Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to the study of the correlation between the ground motion IM and the structural response, Lucchini et al [46] and Kostinakis et al [47] studied the complex process of using a single value to characterize the IMs corresponding to the horizontal components with two-dimensional or three-dimensional ground motion inputting. Based on the analysis results of Scheme 1 in the MSA method, the influence of the four different characterization methods on the aleatory randomness is investigated with the PGA selected as the IM.…”
Section: Characterization Methods Of Bidirectional Ground Motion Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis results of Scheme 1 in the MSA method, the influence of the four different characterization methods on the aleatory randomness is investigated with the PGA selected as the IM. The four characterization methods are as follows [47] When using different characterization methods, each ground motion has a different IM level. In such a situation, to make the collapse fragility curves in Figure 5, n j in Equation (9) is set to 1 and the probability of collapse is set to 1 when θ max is larger than 0.01.…”
Section: Characterization Methods Of Bidirectional Ground Motion Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex seismic isolation system and system of seismic dumping will make it possible to use buildings even after the earthquake, providing the simultaneous checking and repair of the structures' components. Only a few research works related to the high-rise building stiffness [15][16][17][18][19] are known and should be mentioned. The analysis of systems of the passive and active earthquake protections are presented in the first one and also requirements for the systems of high-rise buildings earthquakes passive compensation, the one's own original system of the kinematic earthquake dumper is proposed either.…”
Section: Ivestigation Of High-rise Building State Under the Horizontamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach studies the variation of the seismic performance of a building depending on the orientation that it has respect to the applied ground motion record. Recent research has shown that the maximum ductility demand in the displacement of an elastoplastic system with a single-degree-of-freedom (García-Soto et al, 2012), and the maximum displacement response and expected damage of a specific building (Vargas et al, 2012;Kostinakis et al, 2015;Reyes-Salazar et al, 2016;Kostinakis and Morfidis, 2017), can be presented for a different angle of incidence. This shows that the effect of directionality also has an influence on the structural response of a building.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%