include solar cells that make use of mesoporous TiO 2 electrodes to collect and transport the electronic charges generated in metal-organic dyes, fi rst demonstrated by O'Regan and Grätzel. [ 3 ] Since this fi rst pioneering work, the performance of dye-sensitized TiO 2 solar cells (DSSCs) improved mainly by the development of new pigments that more effectively absorb the solar light spectrum. [ 4,5 ] A recent breakthrough was the introduction of organicinorganic perovskites, which combine high light absorption with good charge transport. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The high perovskite conductivity enabled the exploration of new device architectures spanning from a perovskite-sensitized mesoporous TiO 2 to TiO 2 -free planar heterojunction solar cells. [ 13 ] Currently, the best performing perovskite-based solar cells (PSCs), with a certifi ed power conversion effi ciency of more than 20%, employ a thin mesoporous TiO 2 layer as electron selective contact in combination with a thick solid perovskite absorber over-layer. [ 2 ] Due to the favorable position of its conduction band (CB), a large band gap, long electron lifetimes and low fabrication costs, TiO 2 is frequently used to prepare mesoporous electrodes in several optoelectronic applications. [14][15][16][17] Nevertheless, the relatively high density of electronic trap states below the CB are a signifi cant drawback for the application of TiO 2 electrodes in solar cells. [ 18 ] Indeed, trap states may have a large infl uence on charge recombination and charge transport, which in turn infl uence the solar cell voltage and current. [19][20][21] One method to reduce the trap states in TiO 2 is doping. A wide range of doping elements have been investigated for mesoporous TiO 2 electrodes in DSSCs [ 17,[22][23][24][25][26][27] and more recently in PSCs. [28][29][30][31] Some dopants reduce the charge recombination [ 24 ] or increase electron transport in DSSCs [ 25 ] by reducing trap states below the CB. In addition to changes in the density of trap states, doping may induce a complex interplay of other effects that impact the device performance; for example, it can affect dye absorption or change the nanoparticle size and distribution and thereby the morphology of the mesostructured fi lm, leading to a changed TiO 2 -absorber interface area in DSSCs. [ 22 ] Furthermore, modifying the CB position by TiO 2 doping can either through a downward shift increase electron injection from the dye into the TiO 2 [ 26 ] or through an upward shift increase the open-circuit voltage ( V oc ). [ 27 ] These two effects however adversely affect each other. In PSCs, reduced recombination [ 28 ] and increased Block-copolymer templated chemical solution deposition is used to prepare mesoporous Nd-doped TiO 2 electrodes for perovskite-based solar cells. X-ray diffraction and photothermal defl ection spectroscopy show substitutional incorporation into the TiO 2 crystal lattice for low Nd concentration, and increasing interstitial doping for higher concentrations. Substitutional Nd-doping...