Correlation between depression and intimacy in lung cancer patients and their family caregivers

Abstract

Background Cancer impacts both patients and their family caregivers. This study aimed to explore the interdependence between depression and intimacy in lung cancer patients and their family caregivers, providing the basis for developing a patient-caregiver centered dyadic intervention. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 182 dyads of lung cancer patients and their family caregivers using a convenient sampling. The depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Mutuality Scale (MS) were used to measure participants’ depression and intimacy respectively; and the correlation between depression and intimacy in patients and caregivers was analyzed by establishing the actor-partner interdependence model. Results Thirty four percent of the patients and 19.2% of the caregivers were at risk of depression, with an intimacy score of 2.67 ± 0.74 points and 2.6 ± 0.86 points, respectively; Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between the depression score (r = 0.226, P < 0.01) and intimacy score (r = 0.344, P < 0.01) in patients and caregivers; and the results of actor-partner interdependence model showed that caregivers’ depression had an actor effect on their own intimacy (b = -0.054, P = 0.004) as well as a partner effect on patients’ intimacy (b = -0.041, P = 0.011). However, patients’ depression has no influence on the intimacy of patients or caregivers. Conclusions There is an interdependent relationship between depression and intimacy in lung cancer patients and family caregivers. Therefore, dyadic interventions can help them to cope with cancer together.

Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress Among Family Caregivers of Patients Diagnosed With Oral Cancer in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Compelled by the bonds of kinship and constrained by financial limitations, family caregivers often shoulder the exclusive responsibility for caring for their ailing relatives. This predicament is further exacerbated by the limited availability and exorbitant costs associated with formal caregiving services, particularly pronounced in South Asian countries like India [55][56][57]. Consequently, Indian family caregivers confront a dual challenge, encompassing both the daily exigencies of livelihood and the formidable task of providing care to their ailing family members [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66].…”

Herth Hope Index trajectory and its predictors in middle-aged and elderly patients with lung cancer: A prospective longitudinal observational study

“…This may be because the population of this study was middle-aged and elderly patients, with many children not being around during their radiotherapy and caregivers mainly being caregivers. The study shows that the trust and cooperation between caregivers and patients in China needs to be improved, as described previously [22]. The traditional concept of family companionship in middle-aged and elderly patients is of great signi cance.…”

Cancer patient and caregiver communication about economic concerns and the effect on patient and caregiver partners’ perceptions of family functioning

“…The nancial models of the U.S. health insurance and cancer care delivery systems means a cancer diagnosis brings both heightened emotional stress and nancial strain for most cancer patients and their families. Research has shown that cancer patient and family caregivers mental and physical health outcomes are interconnected (3)(4)(5)(6); there is much work that has characterized vulnerabilities and effects of nancial burden among patients and their families (2,(7)(8)(9). What is unclear is whether willingness vs. reluctance to be communicatively open about the nancial aspects of cancer care, including the impact of the disease and treatment on the employment status of caregivers and patients, is associated with changes in patient and caregiver perceptions of their family relationships.…”