2020
DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_619_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between correctly sized uncuffed endotracheal tube and ultrasonographically determined subglottic diameter in paediatric population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the mid-glottic transverse diameter was also examined. To determine the fitted uncuffed ETT size, we used a leak pressure of 15-25 cm H 2 O to ensure optimal ETT size, which was consistent with the study of Makireddy 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the mid-glottic transverse diameter was also examined. To determine the fitted uncuffed ETT size, we used a leak pressure of 15-25 cm H 2 O to ensure optimal ETT size, which was consistent with the study of Makireddy 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the formulae considered for our study, there are many other predictors that have been proposed in the literature and we did not include them. [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ] Nonetheless, we have included some of the most commonly used formulae for prediction of size of ETT in the paediatric population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonography based predictors are gaining more attention, seem to be more accurate and it is possible that access to ultrasonography will increase in our country in the future. [ 9 10 11 12 ] Apart from ultrasonography, radiography and three-dimensional printer-based predictors have also been evaluated recently. [ 13 14 15 ] It will be interesting to compare them with these newly described predictive parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 19 ] Strict quality vigilance exists for the manuscripts submitted to the IJA, and as a result, the COVID manuscripts have been associated with quite a high rejection rate of nearly 84% [ Figure 1 ]; nevertheless, a variety of COVID-19 related manuscripts got published in the previous issues of the IJA. [ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ]…”
Section: Necessary Measures To Protect the Quality Of Covid Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%