2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.01043.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between circulating endothelial progenitor cell function and allograft rejection in heart transplant patients

Abstract: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) may contribute to rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) by being intrinsically involved in the rejection process and causing neointimal hyperplasia. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), sirolimus and everolimus, have been demonstrated to attenuate the progression of CAV and are cytotoxic to EPC. Thus, one mechanism by which mTORi may protect against CAV is by altering EPC function. Our study measured circulating EPC function and correlated this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 Discrimination The EPC number based on ex vivo culture assay was lower and EPC function was impaired in transplant recipients compared with healthy controls. Different classes of immunosuppressive drugs may affect EPC biology (31,32). Therefore, the lack of discriminative ability of EPC number and EPC function to detect the presence of CAV may be related to a generalized impairment of these parameters in heart transplant recipients receiving different classes of immunosuppressive drugs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cec and Circulating Endothelial Microparticlesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Table 4 Discrimination The EPC number based on ex vivo culture assay was lower and EPC function was impaired in transplant recipients compared with healthy controls. Different classes of immunosuppressive drugs may affect EPC biology (31,32). Therefore, the lack of discriminative ability of EPC number and EPC function to detect the presence of CAV may be related to a generalized impairment of these parameters in heart transplant recipients receiving different classes of immunosuppressive drugs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cec and Circulating Endothelial Microparticlesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is possible that the attenuation of the CAV in the context of recurrent cellular rejection by sirolimus may be through their potent cytotoxic effect on endothelial progenitor cells. 27 Converting to sirolimus therapy may reduce endothelial progenitor cell function and provide a novel mechanism to prevent rejection and possibly attenuate the development of CAV. Sirolimus also preferentially preserves the number and function of CD4 ϩ CD25 ϩ Foxp3 T lymphocytes (Tregs) compared with other T-cell subsets, unlike cyclosporine.…”
Section: Table 5 Adjusted and Unadjusted Cox Hazard Analysis Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the varied phenotypes of these cells (15), EPCs are typically associated with remodeling after vascular injury or ischemia. In the lung, the localization of EPCs was demonstrated in acute injury related to transplantation (16,17) and bacterial pneumonia (18), as well as monocrotaline-induced (19,20) and hypoxia-induced (21) pulmonary hypertension. In contrast, a post-pneumonectomy model after bone marrow transplantation failed to demonstrate the integration of blood-borne EPCs in the remaining lung 28 days after pneumonectomy (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%