1998
DOI: 10.1053/joca.1997.0089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between biochemical composition and magnetic resonance appearance of articular cartilage

Abstract: These results demonstrate that the MR appearance of articular cartilage correlates with the collagen content, but not with that of PGs, of the different zones. Other matrix components might, however, influence the MR appearance by contributing to the macromolecular organization of the tissue.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cartilage has regional differences in extracellular matrix components such as GAG and collagen (33), and a regional difference in MTR is thought to reflect topographic variation in cartilage composition. In this study's in vivo T 1 and T 2 measurements, the %ratio of the deep layer was significantly lower than that of the superficial layer, which may represent a greater susceptibility to MT in the deep layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cartilage has regional differences in extracellular matrix components such as GAG and collagen (33), and a regional difference in MTR is thought to reflect topographic variation in cartilage composition. In this study's in vivo T 1 and T 2 measurements, the %ratio of the deep layer was significantly lower than that of the superficial layer, which may represent a greater susceptibility to MT in the deep layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 10 knees were involved in the T 1 measurement study (three men, two women), and the other 10 knees were involved in the T 2 measurement study (three men, two women). Mean age at time of imaging was 31.8 Ϯ 3.9 years [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] (values are given throughout as mean Ϯ SD [range]) for the T 1 measurement study and 29.5 Ϯ 4.9 years [24 -36] for the T 2 measurement study. Exclusion criteria were history of knee pain or abnormality or trauma of the knee joint requiring medical treatment.…”
Section: Volunteersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because cartilage T2 values increase with increasing water content (4), a senescent decrease in the water content would not produce the observed increase in the cartilage T2 values in the older subjects. Likewise, several studies have shown that cartilage T2 values are insensitive to changes in the proteoglycan concentration (13,23,24), and it is therefore unlikely that changes in proteoglycan content or composition would account for the observed differences in cartilage T2 values. Of note, a recent study of nanomelic chicken cartilage by Mosher et al (13) showed that while the absence of aggrecan in the extracellular matrix does not significantly change the bulk T2 value of the cartilage, it does lead to a broader distribution of T2 values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T 2 relaxation time of articular cartilage is sensitive to collagen concentration, molecular structure, and architecture (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10), and has been shown to demonstrate changes in anatomically intact tissue in vivo (11). It has been shown that delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) reflects the GAG concentration in tissue (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), and is sensitive to physiologic and pathologic conditions in vivo (18 -22).…”
Section: ؊1mentioning
confidence: 99%