1992
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(92)90231-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between basidiomata production and ectomycorrhizal formation in Pinus patula plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research is essential, as some EMF can be very effective in the nursery, but the effects may disappear after a few years in the field (Natarajan, Mohan, and Ingleby 1992;Munyanziza, Kehri, and Bagyaraj 1997). Although the beneficial effects of ectomycorrhizal inoculation may be less obvious in the field, the multiple biotic and abiotic factors that stress plants justify the presence of these fungi in the roots (Garcia et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This research is essential, as some EMF can be very effective in the nursery, but the effects may disappear after a few years in the field (Natarajan, Mohan, and Ingleby 1992;Munyanziza, Kehri, and Bagyaraj 1997). Although the beneficial effects of ectomycorrhizal inoculation may be less obvious in the field, the multiple biotic and abiotic factors that stress plants justify the presence of these fungi in the roots (Garcia et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interspecific differences in investment in basidiocarp production vs EM root biomass have been reported from nature (Danielson, 1984; Natarajan et al. , 1992; Gardes & Bruns, 1996; Jonsson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This may be a common pattern for Suillus species : studies in other ecosystems have also found a low percentage of Suillus spp. mycorrhizas along with a high production of basidiomes (Danielson, 1984 ;Natarajan, Mohan & Ingleby, 1992). * To whom correspondence should be addressed at (present address) : Dept.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%