2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation and comparison of syndesmosis dimension on CT and MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, interpreting ankle MRI needs expert radiologists. Wong et al 21 reported wider measurements in the axial section of CT in comparison with MRI of normal ankles which could be due to cartilage thickness revealed clearly in MRI. Hence, in comparison with MRI, this point should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, interpreting ankle MRI needs expert radiologists. Wong et al 21 reported wider measurements in the axial section of CT in comparison with MRI of normal ankles which could be due to cartilage thickness revealed clearly in MRI. Hence, in comparison with MRI, this point should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Some have described different measurement methods of dimensions or angles to explain the anatomy of incisura fibularis and positions of the fibula in relation to the incisura fibularis. 8,11,13,[18][19][20] We measured only 3 simple popular constant parameters (anterior width, posterior width, overlap), 11,21 because most of the described techniques are complex measurements with multiple lines and references points. Furthermore, some of them may not be reliable, as we cannot exactly determine the rotation of tibia and fibula without having femoral trans-epicondylar axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the widening does not correlate with clinical findings a contralateral comparative CT or an ipsilateral MRI scan is recommended. 81 MRI has been considered the investigation of choice for suspected syndesmotic ligament injury. 22 It demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93% for AITFL injuries and a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for PITFL tears.…”
Section: Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between the anterior tibial tubercle and the nearest fibular point. [5,6,13,18,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Posterior tibiofibular width (B)…”
Section: Conventional 2d Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Anterior, middle, posterior, maximum, and minimum tibiofibular width First described by Gardner et al [25], the anterior tibiofibular width (ATFW) and posterior tibiofibular width (PTFW) are the most commonly used measurements of the distal tibiofibular joint in the literature [5,6,13,18,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. They serve as indicators of diastasis between the tibia and fibula [29].…”
Section: D Measurements Quantifying Tibiofibular Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%