2021
DOI: 10.1049/esi2.12022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation analysis of factors affecting wind power based on machine learning and Shapley value

Abstract: An analysis of the impact of various factors on wind power can help grid dispatchers understand the characteristics of wind power output and improve the accuracy of wind power forecasting. A correlation analysis method of factors affecting wind power is proposed based on machine learning and the Shapley value. First, factors affecting wind power and the method of constructing wind power models based on machine learning are introduced. Then, to measure the influence of factors on wind power, the Shapley value i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic idea of SHAP is to utilize an additive model g ( x ) to fit the trained classifier f ( x ), as shown in formula (5) [26]: f(x)=g(x)=ϕ0+i=1nϕi\begin{equation}f({\bm{x}}) = g({\bm{x}}) = {\phi _0} + \sum_{i = 1}^n {{\phi _i}} \end{equation}where n is the number of characteristics, ϕ 0 is the prediction reference value of the model, that is, the mean value of all samples state levels, and ϕ i is the SHAP value of the i ‐th characteristic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic idea of SHAP is to utilize an additive model g ( x ) to fit the trained classifier f ( x ), as shown in formula (5) [26]: f(x)=g(x)=ϕ0+i=1nϕi\begin{equation}f({\bm{x}}) = g({\bm{x}}) = {\phi _0} + \sum_{i = 1}^n {{\phi _i}} \end{equation}where n is the number of characteristics, ϕ 0 is the prediction reference value of the model, that is, the mean value of all samples state levels, and ϕ i is the SHAP value of the i ‐th characteristic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper combines SHAP to provide a feasible interpretation scheme for the output of complex CatBoost models. The basic idea of SHAP is to utilize an additive model g(x) to fit the trained classifier f(x), as shown in formula (5) [26]:…”
Section: Interpretability Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anticipation of the results which are of interest in the present context is that the covariates should be ranked not only by how much the average error diminishes when each covariate is included (as is done in this work), but also for how much the average error (once the set of covariates is selected) depends on each variable. The latter information can be obtained by computing the Shapley coefficients [38,39] for each variable and, for the data sets of this study, the rotational speed ranks as the highest, which means it is the most explanatory. In Table 2, the determination coefficients between the rotor speed ω and the temperatures selected for the SVR regression are reported.…”
Section: Input Variables Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The feature selection model utilizes the RF algorithm to analyze the correlation of key variables that influence wind power generation capacity, such as meteorological equipment, and selects the two most significant correlation variables. Chuanjun et al (2021) did not consider the wind power time-varying characteristics and complex nonlinear relationships as well as the utilization of a gradient boosting decision tree and artificial neural network supervised learning algorithms in the original correlation analysis to train the wind power model. A correlation analysis based on the importance of the influencing factors and the amount of bias dependence was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%