Correlates with comfort and function after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease

Matsen, Frederick A.; Antoniou, John; Rozencwaig, Richard; Campbell, Barry; Smith, Kevin L.

doi:10.1067/mse.2000.109323

Cited by 59 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The impact of work disability on patient satisfaction after shoulder arthroplasty has previously been recognized. 19,26 Multivariate analysis demonstrated that independent variables predictive of patient satisfaction included pain with activities of daily living, painless use of the arm above the shoulder, and difficulty with toileting. Patient satisfaction was also significantly correlated with the ASES index.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…27 In addition, generic measures of health-related quality of life, such as the Short Form 36 and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, have also been applied. 17,19,32 In the past decade, patient satisfaction as a component of health care outcomes assessment has achieved a critical role in the assessment of outcome after treatment. Moreover, the assessment of patient satisfaction may be used for various purposes, including evaluation of health care delivery systems, comparison of treatment methods, development of patient care models, facilitation of quality improvement, and validation of quality of care.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…16 The assessment of outcome after prosthetic replacement of the shoulder has historically used condition-specific measures, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score index, 15,21 the ConstantMurley score, 10,12 the Simple Shoulder Test, 19 the University of California, Los Angeles end-result score, 11 the Neer result rating, 1 the Cofield modification of the Neer result rating, 28 and the Hospital for Special Surgery score. 27 In addition, generic measures of health-related quality of life, such as the Short Form 36 and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, have also been applied.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after shoulder arthroplasty

Chen¹,

Bain

Horan

et al. 2007

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after shoulder arthroplasty

Chen¹,

Bain

Horan

et al. 2007

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Des études de qualité de vie, il apparaît selon Gartsman et al qu'en terme de retentissement, les affections de l'épaule et en particulier l'omarthrose ont un impact sur la qualité de vie aussi important que l'insuffisance cardiaque, le diabète ou l'infarctus du myocarde [3]. De façon plus générale, les comorbidités semblent être également un facteur important de l'évaluation préopératoire car l'état général est un des facteurs majeurs d'un bon résultat de traitement chirurgical, comme l'a montré Matsen [4], et que par ailleurs ces comorbidités ont un impact négatif sur les valeurs préopératoires du SST et du SF-36 [5].…”

Section: éValuation Cliniqueunclassified

Omarthrose centrée et excentrée

Nizard

2006

Lett Med Phys Readapt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

L'évaluation clinique et radiologique d'une omarthrose est indispensable avant toute décision théra-peutique. L'évaluation clinique doit prendre en compte les données de l'examen clinique classique, mais aussi l'histoire évolutive des symptômes, l'existence de douleurs et des scores fonctionnels évaluant les incapacités.L'évaluation radiologique associe aux radiographies standard le scanner, nécessaire à la décision chirurgicale éventuelle. La trophicité de la coiffe des rotateurs est évaluée par le scanner et sa rupture éventuelle pourra être recherchée.Abstract: The clinical and radiological evaluation of an omarthrosis is required before any treatment can be determined. The clinical evaluation should take into account the data provided by the usual clinical examination, as well as a history of the development of the symptoms, the presence of pains and the functional scores of impairments.The radiological study combines conventional radiographs with scanner, necessary for the eventual surgical decision making. The trophicity of the rotator cuff is assessed with the scanner and its potential rupture could be detected with an arthroscanner.

show abstract

“…In a similar study, Matsen et al 72 evaluated 134 patients that had undergone a TSA. An improvement with SST scores from 4 (preoperative) to 9 at (mean ± SD) 3.4 ± 1.8 years postoperatively was reported.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rehabilitation Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Wilcox

Arslanian²,

Millett³

2005

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a standard operative treatment for a variety of disorders of the glenohumeral joint. Patients, who have continued shoulder pain and loss of function in the presence of advanced joint pathology, despite conservative management, are often managed by undergoing a TSA. The overall outcomes that are reported after surgical intervention are quite good and appear to be primarily determined by the underlying pathology and the tissue quality of the rotator cuff. The current Neer protocol for postoperative TSA rehabilitation is widely used and based on tradition and the basic science of soft tissue and bone healing. The purpose of this paper is to review the indications for TSA, focusing on the underlying pathologies, and to describe the variables that impact the rehabilitation program of individuals who have had a TSA. A postoperative TSA rehabilitation protocol and algorithm, founded on basic science principles and tailored toward the specific clinical condition, are presented. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:821-836. Key Words: physical therapy, protocols, shoulder rehabilitation T he first total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) was performed by Jules Emile Pean in 1893 for the purpose of treating tuberculous arthritis of the shoulder. 68 Neer 81 developed a humeral prosthesis for the treatment of 4-part fractures in 1955, and in the mid-1970s he refined his prosthesis for the treatment of the degenerative humeral head. 82 TSA is a standard treatment intervention for patients with underlying advanced joint pathology who have persistent pain and loss of function despite conservative management. These pathologies include osteoarthritis (OA), 7,13,30,32,39,41,43,44,64,71,74,82,86,88,89,100,101 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 6,34,35,38,52,61,64,76,91,102,106 cuff tear arthropathy, 5,33,64,94,95,107,111 osteonecrosis, 26,48,49,64,70,79 and fractures of the humeral head. 2,3,6,21,42,62,69,85,90,93 Over the last 25 years, surgical techniques and prostheses have advanced greatly. However, there is still considerable variability in surgical techniques, particularly the use of cement for fixation and the type of prosthesis. Despite these significant variations, the overall reported outcomes for patients that have undergone TSA are good. 31,49,64,99,104 Self-assessed health status reports of individuals who have undergone TSA are comparable to those of individuals who have undergone a total hip arthroplasty or coronary artery bypass graft.

show abstract

Correlates with comfort and function after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease

Cited by 59 publications

References 13 publications

Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after shoulder arthroplasty

Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after shoulder arthroplasty

Omarthrose centrée et excentrée

Rehabilitation Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About