Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey

Abstract

Although the traits of psychopathic personality (psychopathy) have received extensive attention from researchers in forensic psychology, psychopathology, and personality psychology, the relations of these traits to aspects of everyday functioning are poorly understood. Using a large internet survey of members of the general population (N = 3388), we examined the association between psychopathic traits, as measured by a brief but well-validated self-report measure, and occupational choice, political orientation, religious affiliation, and geographical residence. Psychopathic traits, especially those linked to fearless dominance, were positively and moderately associated with holding leadership and management positions, as well as high-risk occupations. In addition, psychopathic traits were positively associated with political conservatism, lack of belief in God, and living in Europe as opposed to the United States, although the magnitudes of these statistical effects were generally small in magnitude. Our findings offer preliminary evidence that psychopathic personality traits display meaningful response penetration into daily functioning, and raise provocative questions for future research.

The dark side of Facebook®: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours

“…Thus, individuals who troll on Facebook® are more likely to lack empathy, be driven by the satisfaction of predatory impulses, and show a brazen disregard for the psychological distress caused to others (e.g., Lilienfeld et al, 2014).…”

From Moral Insanity to Psychopathy

“…These considerations also suggest that certain aspects of psychopathy are more widespread in the general population than was thought, and are not conined to the prison population [61].…”

Successful Psychopaths: A Contemporary Phenomenon

“…This is a general description but more speciically we can say that there are various psychopathic subtypes that difer for example regarding levels of impulsivity, social cognition, and aggression. Hence they may be more or less successful in society [50,51], in fact psychopathy is a spectrum rather than a typology, and research using community samples has found individuals to be situated along a "psychopathy continuum" [3,52]. McWilliams also distinguishes psychopathic thinking to a continuum from psychotic-borderline functioning (deined low level) to a neurotic functioning (deined high level) that is characterized with good-enough ego strength and identity integration, capability to use mature defenses and reality testing [23,45]: actually variants or subtypes exist, covering a broad range that spans from unsuccessful to very successful.…”

“…in men probably because females experience realistic limitation earlier (for example they are less physically strong and at greater risk of physical abuse) [23]. Finally we can say that corporate psychopaths are thought to gravitate toward organizations where they can gain money, power, and prestige rather than to the less well-remunerated caring professions [10,26]: they have been found to be more common in some work categories rather than others, including CEOs and lawyers [10,[38][39][40]. This level of incidence results in between 5.75 and 13.5% of employees working with a corporate psychopath, as shown in Figure 2 [10,41,42].…”